Variabilidad genética en géneros de ciervos neotropicales (Mammalia: Cervidae) según loci microsatelitales

Translated title of the contribution: Genetic variability in Neotropical deer genera (Mammalia: Cervidae) according to DNA microsatellite loci

Manuel Ruiz-García, María Martinez-Agüero, Diana Álvarez, Simon Goodman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Species conservation programs are highly based on analyses of population genetics. We compared eight Neotropical Cervidae (Mazama americana, M. gouzaoubira, M. rufina, Odocoileus virginianus, Hippocamelus antisensis, Pudu mephistopholes, Ozotoceros bezoarticus and Blastoceros dichotomus) and some European and Asian Cervidae (Cervus elaphus, C. nippon, Capreolus capreolus, C. pygargus and Dama dama). The European species C. elaphus was our standard for a high degree of genetic variability: we used a Scottish population originated in the mix of diverse Western European subspecies. On the contrary, Cervus nippon (a population from Scotland with a founder effect) was our standard for a depauperated population. The M. americana, M. gouzaoubira and O. virginianus samples had high diversity values close to our C. elaphus population (H= 0.64, 0.70 and 0.61, respectively), while M. rufina was very low, close to C. nippon. Several sample sets of Mazama and Odocoileus yielded a homozygote excess, probably due to the Wahlund (subdivison) effect. There was no evidence of recent bottleneck events.

Translated title of the contributionGenetic variability in Neotropical deer genera (Mammalia: Cervidae) according to DNA microsatellite loci
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)879-904
Number of pages26
JournalRevista de Biologia Tropical
Volume57
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic variability in Neotropical deer genera (Mammalia: Cervidae) according to DNA microsatellite loci'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this