TY - JOUR
T1 - Urban ecosystem Services in Latin America
T2 - mismatch between global concepts and regional realities?
AU - Dobbs, Cynnamon
AU - Escobedo, Francisco J.
AU - Clerici, Nicola
AU - de la Barrera, Francisco
AU - Eleuterio, Ana Alice
AU - MacGregor-Fors, Ian
AU - Reyes-Paecke, Sonia
AU - Vásquez, Alexis
AU - Zea Camaño, Jorge Danilo
AU - Hernández, H. Jaime
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We thank Nina Singh –USA, Juliana Montoya Arango – Colombia, and Ina Falfán -Mexico for their helpful reviews. HJH is supported by FONDECYT 1140319 “Vegetation knowledge-based indicators for urban sustainable planning”; CD is supported by FONDECYT 3150352 “Provision of urban ecosystem services, exploring the effects of planning, urbanization, climate and environmental conditions on the urban forest of Santiago and La Serena”; FDB is supported by FONDECYT 3150351 “Modelación de servicios ecosistémicos de parques urbanos en sectores metropolitanos”. SR is supported by FONDECYT 1161709 “Contribucion del enfoque de servicios ecosistémicos a la planificación urbana”; FDB and SR are supported by CONICYT/FONDAP 15110020.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is one of the most urbanized and biologically diverse regions in the world but is often characterized by weak environmental governance and socioeconomic inequalities. Given large expanses of intact biomes, a long history of pre-Colombian civilizations, and recent urbanization trends, the urban ecosystem services (UES) concept has the potential to address issues of well-being for its citizens. We review relevant regional and global literature and use expert-based knowledge to identify the state of the art of the UES concept as applicable to green spaces in LAC and elucidate three overarching guidelines for management and future research needs: 1. LAC cities can be socio-ecologically unique; 2. Drivers of UES in LAC can be different than in other regions; and 3. Context and demand need to be accounted for when valuing UES. Overall, we show that research on UES is mostly from the global north and rarely accounts for the diverse and complex socio-political and ecological drivers of LAC’s urbanization processes. We find that, as in other regions, the biophysical context and land use policies play a major role on UES provision. However, socioeconomic inequalities and weak governance are key drivers in UES supply and demand in LAC. Context-specific information on how to promote, educate, and apply UES is particularly important, not only in LAC, but in other regions where inequities, rapid urbanization, and climate change effects are stressing socio-political and ecological systems and their adaptive capacities. Standardized approaches from developed countries should be used to complement - not substitute – LAC context specific approaches for studying and applying UES. We suggest that improved research funding and local governance can also provide critical strategies, information and the means for more effective management, planning, and equitable provision of UES.
AB - Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is one of the most urbanized and biologically diverse regions in the world but is often characterized by weak environmental governance and socioeconomic inequalities. Given large expanses of intact biomes, a long history of pre-Colombian civilizations, and recent urbanization trends, the urban ecosystem services (UES) concept has the potential to address issues of well-being for its citizens. We review relevant regional and global literature and use expert-based knowledge to identify the state of the art of the UES concept as applicable to green spaces in LAC and elucidate three overarching guidelines for management and future research needs: 1. LAC cities can be socio-ecologically unique; 2. Drivers of UES in LAC can be different than in other regions; and 3. Context and demand need to be accounted for when valuing UES. Overall, we show that research on UES is mostly from the global north and rarely accounts for the diverse and complex socio-political and ecological drivers of LAC’s urbanization processes. We find that, as in other regions, the biophysical context and land use policies play a major role on UES provision. However, socioeconomic inequalities and weak governance are key drivers in UES supply and demand in LAC. Context-specific information on how to promote, educate, and apply UES is particularly important, not only in LAC, but in other regions where inequities, rapid urbanization, and climate change effects are stressing socio-political and ecological systems and their adaptive capacities. Standardized approaches from developed countries should be used to complement - not substitute – LAC context specific approaches for studying and applying UES. We suggest that improved research funding and local governance can also provide critical strategies, information and the means for more effective management, planning, and equitable provision of UES.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054497494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054497494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11252-018-0805-3
DO - 10.1007/s11252-018-0805-3
M3 - Research Article
AN - SCOPUS:85054497494
SN - 1083-8155
VL - 22
SP - 173
EP - 187
JO - Urban Ecosystems
JF - Urban Ecosystems
IS - 1
ER -