TY - JOUR
T1 - Doctor-patient communication in different European health care systems
T2 - Relevance and performance from the patients' perspective
AU - van den Brink-Muinen, A.
AU - Verhaak, P. F.M.
AU - Bensing, J. M.
AU - Bahrs, O.
AU - Deveugele, M.
AU - Gask, L.
AU - Leiva, F.
AU - Mead, N.
AU - Messerli, V.
AU - Oppizzi, L.
AU - Peltenburg, M.
AU - Perez, A.
PY - 2000/1
Y1 - 2000/1
N2 - Our aim is to investigate differences between European health care systems in the importance attached by patients to different aspects of doctor-patient communication and the GPs' performance of these aspects, both being from the patients' perspective. 3658 patients of 190 GPs in six European countries (Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland) completed pre- and post-visit questionnaires about relevance and performance of doctor-patient communication. Data were analyzed by variance analysis and by multilevel analysis. In the non-gatekeeping countries, patients considered both biomedical and psychosocial communication aspects to be more important than the patients in the gatekeeping countries. Similarly, in the patients' perception, the non-gatekeeping GPs dealt with these aspects more often. Patient characteristics (gender, age, education, psychosocial problems, bad health, depressive feelings, GPs' assessment of psychosocial background) showed many relationships. Of the GP characteristics, only the GPs' psychosocial diagnosis was associated with patient-reported psychosocial relevance and performance. Talking about biomedical issues was more important for the patients than talking about psychosocial issues, unless the patients presented psychosocial problems to the GP. Discrepancies between relevance and performance were apparent, especially with respect to biomedical aspects. The implications for health policy and for general practitioners are discussed.
AB - Our aim is to investigate differences between European health care systems in the importance attached by patients to different aspects of doctor-patient communication and the GPs' performance of these aspects, both being from the patients' perspective. 3658 patients of 190 GPs in six European countries (Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland) completed pre- and post-visit questionnaires about relevance and performance of doctor-patient communication. Data were analyzed by variance analysis and by multilevel analysis. In the non-gatekeeping countries, patients considered both biomedical and psychosocial communication aspects to be more important than the patients in the gatekeeping countries. Similarly, in the patients' perception, the non-gatekeeping GPs dealt with these aspects more often. Patient characteristics (gender, age, education, psychosocial problems, bad health, depressive feelings, GPs' assessment of psychosocial background) showed many relationships. Of the GP characteristics, only the GPs' psychosocial diagnosis was associated with patient-reported psychosocial relevance and performance. Talking about biomedical issues was more important for the patients than talking about psychosocial issues, unless the patients presented psychosocial problems to the GP. Discrepancies between relevance and performance were apparent, especially with respect to biomedical aspects. The implications for health policy and for general practitioners are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033991288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033991288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00098-1
DO - 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00098-1
M3 - Research Article
C2 - 11013553
AN - SCOPUS:0033991288
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 39
SP - 115
EP - 127
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 1
ER -