Anterior chamber inflammation grading methods: A critical review

Hnin Hnin Oo; Madhuvanthi Mohan; Wenjun Song; William Rojas-Carabali; Edmund Tsui; Alejandra de-la-Torre; Carlos Cifuentes-González; Andres Rousselot; Sangly P. Srinivas; Tariq Aslam; Vishali Gupta; Rupesh Agrawal

doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.10.005

Anterior chamber inflammation grading methods: A critical review

Hnin Hnin Oo, Madhuvanthi Mohan, Wenjun Song, William Rojas-Carabali, Edmund Tsui, Alejandra de-la-Torre, Carlos Cifuentes-González, Andres Rousselot, Sangly P. Srinivas, Tariq Aslam, Vishali Gupta, Rupesh Agrawal

School of Medicine and Health Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Assessing anterior chamber inflammation is highly subjective and challenging. Although various grading systems attempt to offer objectivity and standardization, the clinical assessment has high interobserver variability. Traditional techniques, such as laser flare meter and fluorophotometry, are not widely used since they are time-consuming. With the development of optical coherence tomography with high sensitivity, direct imaging offers an excellent alternative to assess objectively inflammation with the potential for automated analysis. We describe various anterior chamber inflammation grading methods and discuss their utility, advantages, and disadvantages.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	253-264
Number of pages	12
Journal	Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume	69
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.10.005
State	Published - Mar 1 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Ophthalmology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.10.005

Cite this

@article{f2e00e3f1dc845d1bbf8e19bd49e0e43,

title = "Anterior chamber inflammation grading methods: A critical review",

abstract = "Assessing anterior chamber inflammation is highly subjective and challenging. Although various grading systems attempt to offer objectivity and standardization, the clinical assessment has high interobserver variability. Traditional techniques, such as laser flare meter and fluorophotometry, are not widely used since they are time-consuming. With the development of optical coherence tomography with high sensitivity, direct imaging offers an excellent alternative to assess objectively inflammation with the potential for automated analysis. We describe various anterior chamber inflammation grading methods and discuss their utility, advantages, and disadvantages.",

author = "Oo, {Hnin Hnin} and Madhuvanthi Mohan and Wenjun Song and William Rojas-Carabali and Edmund Tsui and Alejandra de-la-Torre and Carlos Cifuentes-Gonz{\'a}lez and Andres Rousselot and Srinivas, {Sangly P.} and Tariq Aslam and Vishali Gupta and Rupesh Agrawal",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2024",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.10.005",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "69",

pages = "253--264",

journal = "Survey of Ophthalmology",

issn = "0039-6257",

publisher = "Elsevier USA",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anterior chamber inflammation grading methods

T2 - A critical review

AU - Oo, Hnin Hnin

AU - Mohan, Madhuvanthi

AU - Song, Wenjun

AU - Rojas-Carabali, William

AU - Tsui, Edmund

AU - de-la-Torre, Alejandra

AU - Cifuentes-González, Carlos

AU - Rousselot, Andres

AU - Srinivas, Sangly P.

AU - Aslam, Tariq

AU - Gupta, Vishali

AU - Agrawal, Rupesh

PY - 2024/3/1

Y1 - 2024/3/1

N2 - Assessing anterior chamber inflammation is highly subjective and challenging. Although various grading systems attempt to offer objectivity and standardization, the clinical assessment has high interobserver variability. Traditional techniques, such as laser flare meter and fluorophotometry, are not widely used since they are time-consuming. With the development of optical coherence tomography with high sensitivity, direct imaging offers an excellent alternative to assess objectively inflammation with the potential for automated analysis. We describe various anterior chamber inflammation grading methods and discuss their utility, advantages, and disadvantages.

AB - Assessing anterior chamber inflammation is highly subjective and challenging. Although various grading systems attempt to offer objectivity and standardization, the clinical assessment has high interobserver variability. Traditional techniques, such as laser flare meter and fluorophotometry, are not widely used since they are time-consuming. With the development of optical coherence tomography with high sensitivity, direct imaging offers an excellent alternative to assess objectively inflammation with the potential for automated analysis. We describe various anterior chamber inflammation grading methods and discuss their utility, advantages, and disadvantages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178157775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85178157775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.10.005

M3 - Review article

C2 - 37804869

AN - SCOPUS:85178157775

SN - 0039-6257

VL - 69

SP - 253

EP - 264

JO - Survey of Ophthalmology

JF - Survey of Ophthalmology

IS - 2

ER -

Anterior chamber inflammation grading methods: A critical review

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this