TY - JOUR
T1 - A mechanism for the efficient provision of Potential Pareto public goods
AU - Ferraz, null
AU - Mantilla, César
N1 - Funding Information:
Comments from Diego Aycinena, Lucas Finamor, Ian Flint, Margarita Gáfaro, Vinicius Lima, Pepita Miquel-Florensa, Mounu Prem, Santiago Saavedra, Rodrigo Soares, and Juan Vargas, as well as suggestions from participants in the Economics Seminar at Universidad del Rosario, were extremely valuable. Financial Support from the program “ Inclusión productiva y social: Programas y políticas para la promoción de una economía formal, código 60185, que conforma la Alianza EFI, bajo el Contrato de Recuperación Contingente No. FP44842-220-2018 .” is gratefully acknowledged.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Providing a public good that causes a local harm to its host poses two problems previously unexplored together: where to locate it and how large it should be. We propose a mechanism combining some market-like properties with a modified second-price auction. The mechanism selects a host, a facility size, a compensation for hosting the project, and determines how the compensation is split among the non-hosts. If each community bids truthfully for becoming the host–a strategy from which no community has incentives to deviate–the selected allocation is globally optimal, even if communities’ preferences are private information. In contrast with the literature, the host pays the second-highest bid while receiving the market benefits to prevent distortions in the optimal size.
AB - Providing a public good that causes a local harm to its host poses two problems previously unexplored together: where to locate it and how large it should be. We propose a mechanism combining some market-like properties with a modified second-price auction. The mechanism selects a host, a facility size, a compensation for hosting the project, and determines how the compensation is split among the non-hosts. If each community bids truthfully for becoming the host–a strategy from which no community has incentives to deviate–the selected allocation is globally optimal, even if communities’ preferences are private information. In contrast with the literature, the host pays the second-highest bid while receiving the market benefits to prevent distortions in the optimal size.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169573992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85169573992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104953
DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104953
M3 - Research Article
AN - SCOPUS:85169573992
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 225
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
M1 - 104953
ER -