Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR Inglaterra

Arlene Beth Tickner, David L. Blaney

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a RevistaArtículo

9 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This article argues that attention to representational practices and epistemology, however important for expanding the boundaries of International Relations as a field of study, has been insufficient for dealing with difference in world politics, where ontological conflicts are also at play. We suggest that IR, as a latecomer to the ‘ontological turn’, has yet to engage systematically with ‘singular world’ logics introduced by colonial modernity and their effacement of alternative worlds. In addition to exploring how even critical scholars concerned with the ‘othering’ and ‘worlding’ of difference sidestep issues of ontology, we critique the ontological violence performed by norms constructivism and the only limited openings offered by the Global IR project. Drawing on literatures from science and technology studies, anthropology, political ecology, standpoint feminism and decolonial thought, we examine the potentials of a politics of ontology for unmaking the colonial universe, cultivating the pluriverse, and crafting a decolonial science. The article ends with an idea of what this might mean for International Relations.
Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)1 - 19
Número de páginas19
PublicaciónMillennium: Journal of International Studies
Volumen45
DOI
EstadoPublished - 2017

Huella dactilar

ontology
international relations
technology studies
world politics
politics
science studies
constructivism
field of study
feminism
environmental policy
epistemology
modernity
anthropology
violence
science
literature

Citar esto

@article{1711abb4ed444ea6ae5283db30564fef,
title = "Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR Inglaterra",
abstract = "This article argues that attention to representational practices and epistemology, however important for expanding the boundaries of International Relations as a field of study, has been insufficient for dealing with difference in world politics, where ontological conflicts are also at play. We suggest that IR, as a latecomer to the ‘ontological turn’, has yet to engage systematically with ‘singular world’ logics introduced by colonial modernity and their effacement of alternative worlds. In addition to exploring how even critical scholars concerned with the ‘othering’ and ‘worlding’ of difference sidestep issues of ontology, we critique the ontological violence performed by norms constructivism and the only limited openings offered by the Global IR project. Drawing on literatures from science and technology studies, anthropology, political ecology, standpoint feminism and decolonial thought, we examine the potentials of a politics of ontology for unmaking the colonial universe, cultivating the pluriverse, and crafting a decolonial science. The article ends with an idea of what this might mean for International Relations.",
author = "Tickner, {Arlene Beth} and Blaney, {David L.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/0305829817702446",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "1 -- 19",
journal = "Millennium: Journal of International Studies",
issn = "0305-8298",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR Inglaterra. / Tickner, Arlene Beth; Blaney, David L.

En: Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 45, 2017, p. 1 - 19 .

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a RevistaArtículo

TY - JOUR

T1 - Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR Inglaterra

AU - Tickner, Arlene Beth

AU - Blaney, David L.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article argues that attention to representational practices and epistemology, however important for expanding the boundaries of International Relations as a field of study, has been insufficient for dealing with difference in world politics, where ontological conflicts are also at play. We suggest that IR, as a latecomer to the ‘ontological turn’, has yet to engage systematically with ‘singular world’ logics introduced by colonial modernity and their effacement of alternative worlds. In addition to exploring how even critical scholars concerned with the ‘othering’ and ‘worlding’ of difference sidestep issues of ontology, we critique the ontological violence performed by norms constructivism and the only limited openings offered by the Global IR project. Drawing on literatures from science and technology studies, anthropology, political ecology, standpoint feminism and decolonial thought, we examine the potentials of a politics of ontology for unmaking the colonial universe, cultivating the pluriverse, and crafting a decolonial science. The article ends with an idea of what this might mean for International Relations.

AB - This article argues that attention to representational practices and epistemology, however important for expanding the boundaries of International Relations as a field of study, has been insufficient for dealing with difference in world politics, where ontological conflicts are also at play. We suggest that IR, as a latecomer to the ‘ontological turn’, has yet to engage systematically with ‘singular world’ logics introduced by colonial modernity and their effacement of alternative worlds. In addition to exploring how even critical scholars concerned with the ‘othering’ and ‘worlding’ of difference sidestep issues of ontology, we critique the ontological violence performed by norms constructivism and the only limited openings offered by the Global IR project. Drawing on literatures from science and technology studies, anthropology, political ecology, standpoint feminism and decolonial thought, we examine the potentials of a politics of ontology for unmaking the colonial universe, cultivating the pluriverse, and crafting a decolonial science. The article ends with an idea of what this might mean for International Relations.

U2 - 10.1177/0305829817702446

DO - 10.1177/0305829817702446

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Millennium: Journal of International Studies

JF - Millennium: Journal of International Studies

SN - 0305-8298

ER -