Spatializing Religious Freedom: Inhabiting the Legal Frontier Between Ethnic and National Rights

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a RevistaArtículo

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This article addresses the complex legal endeavour to shape the frontiers between two of the most fundamental liberal rights in multicultural nation states: the right to cultural difference and the right to religious freedom in Colombia. I follow one dispute, between members of the indigenous Arhuaco group who are Evangelical Christians and their indigenous local authorities. This example illuminates longstanding debates surrounding the relationship between religion and politics within legally plural states. I put together different scales of analysis for understanding: (i) the legal definition of the right to religious freedom and the right to ethnic cultural difference as private or public and individual or collective; (ii) the debate about the political meaning of religious practice by studying, for example, how it relates to claims over inequality and land access; and (iii) the importance of understanding the meaning of conversion for addressing the legal difficulty of creating a sustainable boundary between these two rights. © The Author(s) 2013.
Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)31-53
Número de páginas23
PublicaciónSocial and Legal Studies
DOI
EstadoPublished - mar 1 2014

Huella dactilar

religious freedom
cultural difference
Colombia
nation state
Religion
politics
Group

Citar esto

@article{752564095b0f4ba69b3839e0aadb3576,
title = "Spatializing Religious Freedom: Inhabiting the Legal Frontier Between Ethnic and National Rights",
abstract = "This article addresses the complex legal endeavour to shape the frontiers between two of the most fundamental liberal rights in multicultural nation states: the right to cultural difference and the right to religious freedom in Colombia. I follow one dispute, between members of the indigenous Arhuaco group who are Evangelical Christians and their indigenous local authorities. This example illuminates longstanding debates surrounding the relationship between religion and politics within legally plural states. I put together different scales of analysis for understanding: (i) the legal definition of the right to religious freedom and the right to ethnic cultural difference as private or public and individual or collective; (ii) the debate about the political meaning of religious practice by studying, for example, how it relates to claims over inequality and land access; and (iii) the importance of understanding the meaning of conversion for addressing the legal difficulty of creating a sustainable boundary between these two rights. {\circledC} The Author(s) 2013.",
author = "Diana Bocarejo",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0964663913487094",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "31--53",
journal = "Social and Legal Studies",
issn = "0964-6639",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Spatializing Religious Freedom: Inhabiting the Legal Frontier Between Ethnic and National Rights. / Bocarejo, Diana.

En: Social and Legal Studies, 01.03.2014, p. 31-53.

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a RevistaArtículo

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatializing Religious Freedom: Inhabiting the Legal Frontier Between Ethnic and National Rights

AU - Bocarejo, Diana

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - This article addresses the complex legal endeavour to shape the frontiers between two of the most fundamental liberal rights in multicultural nation states: the right to cultural difference and the right to religious freedom in Colombia. I follow one dispute, between members of the indigenous Arhuaco group who are Evangelical Christians and their indigenous local authorities. This example illuminates longstanding debates surrounding the relationship between religion and politics within legally plural states. I put together different scales of analysis for understanding: (i) the legal definition of the right to religious freedom and the right to ethnic cultural difference as private or public and individual or collective; (ii) the debate about the political meaning of religious practice by studying, for example, how it relates to claims over inequality and land access; and (iii) the importance of understanding the meaning of conversion for addressing the legal difficulty of creating a sustainable boundary between these two rights. © The Author(s) 2013.

AB - This article addresses the complex legal endeavour to shape the frontiers between two of the most fundamental liberal rights in multicultural nation states: the right to cultural difference and the right to religious freedom in Colombia. I follow one dispute, between members of the indigenous Arhuaco group who are Evangelical Christians and their indigenous local authorities. This example illuminates longstanding debates surrounding the relationship between religion and politics within legally plural states. I put together different scales of analysis for understanding: (i) the legal definition of the right to religious freedom and the right to ethnic cultural difference as private or public and individual or collective; (ii) the debate about the political meaning of religious practice by studying, for example, how it relates to claims over inequality and land access; and (iii) the importance of understanding the meaning of conversion for addressing the legal difficulty of creating a sustainable boundary between these two rights. © The Author(s) 2013.

U2 - 10.1177/0964663913487094

DO - 10.1177/0964663913487094

M3 - Article

SP - 31

EP - 53

JO - Social and Legal Studies

JF - Social and Legal Studies

SN - 0964-6639

ER -