Social Epistemology and Validation in Agent-Based Social Simulation

David Enrique Anzola Pinzon

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

4 Citas (Scopus)


The literature in agent-based social simulation suggests that a model is validated when it is shown to ‘successfully’, ‘adequately’ or ‘satisfactorily’ represent the target phenomenon. The notion of ‘successful’, ‘adequate’ or ‘satisfactory’ representation, however, is both underspecified and difficult to generalise, in part, because practitioners use a multiplicity of criteria to judge representation, some of which are not entirely dependent on the testing of a computational model during validation processes. This article argues that practitioners should address social epistemology to achieve a deeper understanding of how warrants for belief in the adequacy of representation are produced. Two fundamental social processes for validation: interpretation and commensuration, are discussed to justify this claim. The analysis is advanced with a twofold aim. First, it shows that the conceptualisation of validation could greatly benefit from incorporating elements of social epistemology, for the criteria used to judge adequacy of representation are influenced by the social, cognitive and physical organisation of social simulation. Second, it evidences that standardisation tools such as protocols and frameworks fall short in accounting for key elements of social epistemology that affect different instances of validation processes.
Idioma originalInglés estadounidense
Número de artículo34
Páginas (desde-hasta)1-29
Número de páginas30
Publicación Philosophy & Technology
EstadoPublicada - ago. 5 2021


Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Social Epistemology and Validation in Agent-Based Social Simulation'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto