Retraction: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) "assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact" (Research Evaluation DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy037)

Brian M. Belcher; Luisa F. Ramirez; Rachel Davel; Rachel Claus

doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy022

Retraction: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) "assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact" (Research Evaluation DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy037)

Brian M. Belcher
, Luisa F. Ramirez
, Rachel Davel
, Rachel Claus

Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

Producción científica: Contribución a revista › Comentario/Debate › revisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

This article was retracted and has been replaced with 10.1093/reseval/rvy037.

Idioma original	Inglés estadounidense
Páginas (desde-hasta)	E1
Publicación	Research Evaluation
Volumen	28
N.º	2
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy022
Estado	Publicada - abr 1 2019

Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus

Educación
Biblioteconomía y ciencias de la información

Acceder al documento

10.1093/reseval/rvy022

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Retraction: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) "assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact" (Research Evaluation DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy037)'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto

Belcher, B. M., Ramirez, L. F., Davel, R., & Claus, R. (2019). Retraction: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) "assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact" (Research Evaluation DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy037). Research Evaluation, 28(2), E1. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy022

Belcher, Brian M. ; Ramirez, Luisa F. ; Davel, Rachel et al. / Retraction : A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) "assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact" (Research Evaluation DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy037). En: Research Evaluation. 2019 ; Vol. 28, N.º 2. pp. E1.

@article{aa7055a7e19445febf95c9fbd66193cd,

title = "Retraction: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) {"}assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact{"} (Research Evaluation DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy037)",

abstract = "This article was retracted and has been replaced with 10.1093/reseval/rvy037.",

author = "Belcher, \{Brian M.\} and Ramirez, \{Luisa F.\} and Rachel Davel and Rachel Claus",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 The Author(s).",

year = "2019",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/reseval/rvy022",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "28",

pages = "E1",

journal = "Research Evaluation",

issn = "0958-2029",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

Belcher, BM, Ramirez, LF, Davel, R & Claus, R 2019, 'Retraction: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) "assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact" (Research Evaluation DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy037)', Research Evaluation, vol. 28, n.º 2, pp. E1. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy022

Retraction: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) "assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact" (Research Evaluation DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy037). / Belcher, Brian M.; Ramirez, Luisa F.; Davel, Rachel et al.
En: Research Evaluation, Vol. 28, N.º 2, 01.04.2019, p. E1.

Producción científica: Contribución a revista › Comentario/Debate › revisión exhaustiva

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retraction

T2 - A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) "assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact" (Research Evaluation DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy037)

AU - Belcher, Brian M.

AU - Ramirez, Luisa F.

AU - Davel, Rachel

AU - Claus, Rachel

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - This article was retracted and has been replaced with 10.1093/reseval/rvy037.

AB - This article was retracted and has been replaced with 10.1093/reseval/rvy037.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064140254

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064140254#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1093/reseval/rvy022

DO - 10.1093/reseval/rvy022

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85064140254

SN - 0958-2029

VL - 28

SP - E1

JO - Research Evaluation

JF - Research Evaluation

IS - 2

ER -

Belcher BM, Ramirez LF, Davel R, Claus R. Retraction: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) "assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact" (Research Evaluation DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy037). Research Evaluation. 2019 abr 1;28(2):E1. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvy022