Reconciliation: A comprehensive framework for empirical analysis

Angelika Rettberg, Juan E. Ugarriza

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a RevistaArtículo

9 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.There appears to be a rift between the theoretical and normative understandings of what reconciliation means and offers, and what people expect to happen in postconflict scenarios. Here we present a conceptual framework that captures the definitional diversity surrounding the concept of reconciliation and then operationalizes it in order to analyze responses from postconflict populations. The illustrative application of our framework to responses from a representative survey of 1,843 Colombian citizens reveals that people’s convictions are just as diverse as scholars’. Nevertheless, significant proportions of respondents seem to understand reconciliation to be primarily a psychological and political process which aims to achieve the re-establishment of quotidian or day-to-day relations and cooperation; which should be preceded by the cessation of violence, dialogue, goodwill, and attitudinal and emotional change; and which should be accompanied by social welfare and security. It is noteworthy that understandings of reconciliation as a process mediated by justice, truth, and memory are scarce. The application of this framework will help to reveal differences between hopes and promises, and inform scholarly work and policymaking that is more realistically rooted.
Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)517-540
Número de páginas24
PublicaciónSecurity Dialogue
DOI
EstadoPublished - dic 1 2016

Huella dactilar

reconciliation
social security
social welfare
justice
dialogue
violence
scenario
citizen

Citar esto

@article{81215a77be2849e0a21edb66a2cbe88a,
title = "Reconciliation: A comprehensive framework for empirical analysis",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2016, {\circledC} The Author(s) 2016.There appears to be a rift between the theoretical and normative understandings of what reconciliation means and offers, and what people expect to happen in postconflict scenarios. Here we present a conceptual framework that captures the definitional diversity surrounding the concept of reconciliation and then operationalizes it in order to analyze responses from postconflict populations. The illustrative application of our framework to responses from a representative survey of 1,843 Colombian citizens reveals that people’s convictions are just as diverse as scholars’. Nevertheless, significant proportions of respondents seem to understand reconciliation to be primarily a psychological and political process which aims to achieve the re-establishment of quotidian or day-to-day relations and cooperation; which should be preceded by the cessation of violence, dialogue, goodwill, and attitudinal and emotional change; and which should be accompanied by social welfare and security. It is noteworthy that understandings of reconciliation as a process mediated by justice, truth, and memory are scarce. The application of this framework will help to reveal differences between hopes and promises, and inform scholarly work and policymaking that is more realistically rooted.",
author = "Angelika Rettberg and Ugarriza, {Juan E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0967010616671858",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "517--540",
journal = "Security Dialogue",
issn = "0967-0106",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Reconciliation: A comprehensive framework for empirical analysis. / Rettberg, Angelika; Ugarriza, Juan E.

En: Security Dialogue, 01.12.2016, p. 517-540.

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a RevistaArtículo

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconciliation: A comprehensive framework for empirical analysis

AU - Rettberg, Angelika

AU - Ugarriza, Juan E.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - © 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.There appears to be a rift between the theoretical and normative understandings of what reconciliation means and offers, and what people expect to happen in postconflict scenarios. Here we present a conceptual framework that captures the definitional diversity surrounding the concept of reconciliation and then operationalizes it in order to analyze responses from postconflict populations. The illustrative application of our framework to responses from a representative survey of 1,843 Colombian citizens reveals that people’s convictions are just as diverse as scholars’. Nevertheless, significant proportions of respondents seem to understand reconciliation to be primarily a psychological and political process which aims to achieve the re-establishment of quotidian or day-to-day relations and cooperation; which should be preceded by the cessation of violence, dialogue, goodwill, and attitudinal and emotional change; and which should be accompanied by social welfare and security. It is noteworthy that understandings of reconciliation as a process mediated by justice, truth, and memory are scarce. The application of this framework will help to reveal differences between hopes and promises, and inform scholarly work and policymaking that is more realistically rooted.

AB - © 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.There appears to be a rift between the theoretical and normative understandings of what reconciliation means and offers, and what people expect to happen in postconflict scenarios. Here we present a conceptual framework that captures the definitional diversity surrounding the concept of reconciliation and then operationalizes it in order to analyze responses from postconflict populations. The illustrative application of our framework to responses from a representative survey of 1,843 Colombian citizens reveals that people’s convictions are just as diverse as scholars’. Nevertheless, significant proportions of respondents seem to understand reconciliation to be primarily a psychological and political process which aims to achieve the re-establishment of quotidian or day-to-day relations and cooperation; which should be preceded by the cessation of violence, dialogue, goodwill, and attitudinal and emotional change; and which should be accompanied by social welfare and security. It is noteworthy that understandings of reconciliation as a process mediated by justice, truth, and memory are scarce. The application of this framework will help to reveal differences between hopes and promises, and inform scholarly work and policymaking that is more realistically rooted.

U2 - 10.1177/0967010616671858

DO - 10.1177/0967010616671858

M3 - Article

SP - 517

EP - 540

JO - Security Dialogue

JF - Security Dialogue

SN - 0967-0106

ER -