Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition

Título traducido de la contribución: Datos fitosociolótgicos y colecciones de herbario muestran patrones congruentes de gran escala pero son diferentes en su descripción de comunidades locales

Marius Jean Bottin, Gwendolyn Peyre, Carlos Vargas, Lauren Raz, James Edward Richardson, Adriana Sanchez

    Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículo

    Resumen

    Question: As a result of recent and substantial digitization efforts, herbaria are be- coming important sources of data for vegetation scientists. Are such data sets ap- propriate to describe composition gradients and β-diversity? When compared with phytosociological data, what are the differences in terms of composition (co-occur- rence) gradients depending on the considered scale?
    Location: Páramos (Neo-tropical alpine ecosystems) of Colombia.
    Methods: We compared vegetation patterns from phytosociological relevés and re- constructed pseudo-communities from herbarium collections in the Colombian high elevation páramo ecosystem using diversity partitioning and Mantel correlations. Results: Species composition differed in the two data sets, which could be explained by taxonomic bias towards charismatic species and overrepresentation of rare spe- cies in the herbarium data set, whereas common species were more frequently rep- resented in the phytosociological data set. The two data sets showed a similarly preponderant importance of large-scale differences when we looked at species ac- cumulation across different scales. Small-scale richness contributed more to total richness for the phytosociological data set, while richness at intermediate scales was more important in the herbarium data set. Finally, pairwise β-diversity analyses did not show correlations between data sets, and common species showed similar eco- logical distribution patterns.
    Conclusions: We recommend caution to researchers who wish to describe β-diversity patterns in local communities using only herbarium data. However, since the two data sets showed some complementarity in their composition patterns, we suggest that combining data from relevés (or plots) and occurrence data (herbarium records, citizen science, etc.) could be an efficient strategy for describing broader diversity patterns. We discuss the circumstances under which it could be advantageous to work with such combined data sets, in particular in relation to conservation issues.
    Título traducido de la contribuciónDatos fitosociolótgicos y colecciones de herbario muestran patrones congruentes de gran escala pero son diferentes en su descripción de comunidades locales
    Idioma originalInglés estadounidense
    Páginas (desde-hasta)1-9
    Número de páginas9
    PublicaciónJournal of Vegetation Science
    EstadoPublicada - nov 1 2019

    Citar esto