Non-pharmacological rehabilitation strategies for pulmonary and physical recovery in ICU survivors after COVID-19: A systematic review

BackgroundSurvivors of severe COVID-19 requiring intensive care frequently experience persistent pulmonary and functional impairment consistent with post–critical illness sequelae. The effectiveness of non-pharmacological rehabilitation in this severity-specific subgroup remains uncertain.MethodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Epistemonikos, LILACS, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized and observational studies evaluating non-pharmacological rehabilitation in adult ICU survivors of COVID-19. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Given substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, quantitative meta-analysis was not performed; a structured narrative synthesis was undertaken.ResultsFourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Five incorporated comparator groups, while nine employed uncontrolled pre–post designs. Interventions ranged from early ICU mobilization to inpatient and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation. Controlled studies reported variable between-group benefits in dyspnea and functional outcomes, whereas observational studies consistently described within-group improvement over time. However, most studies were at moderate to serious risk of bias, and heterogeneity in intervention timing, dosage, and outcome assessment limited comparability.ConclusionsNon-pharmacological rehabilitation in ICU survivors of COVID-19 is associated with improvement over time; however, the certainty of causal effectiveness remains low. ICU survivors constitute a distinct recovery population within the broader post-COVID spectrum. Adequately powered, multicenter randomized trials with standardized protocols and harmonized outcomes are required to establish long-term effectiveness.