Resumen
| Idioma original | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 62-90 |
| Número de páginas | 29 |
| Publicación | Social Science Information |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - mar 1 2013 |
Huella dactilar
Citar esto
}
La juste distance? Comment les sciences sociales et historiques pensent la différence. / Bosa, Bastien.
En: Social Science Information, 01.03.2013, p. 62-90.Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a Revista › Artículo
TY - JOUR
T1 - La juste distance? Comment les sciences sociales et historiques pensent la différence
AU - Bosa, Bastien
PY - 2013/3/1
Y1 - 2013/3/1
N2 - This article presents three tensions related to the concept of 'difference' in the social and historical sciences. The first tension is related to ethnocentrism and anachronism: the author shows that they both represent simultaneously dangers that must be prevented and unavoidable working tools. The second tension is related to the role of conceptualization and to the difficult choice that social scientists have to make between 'native categories' and 'analytical categories'. Finally, the third dilemma is related to the impossibility for the researcher to find a right distance (juste distance) in relation with the world he studies (be it a familiar or unfamiliar world). The author attempts to show that, although these tensions are often thought of separately, they are in fact closely related, and concern the need for all research projects to be taking the social world as their research object. © The Author(s) 2013.
AB - This article presents three tensions related to the concept of 'difference' in the social and historical sciences. The first tension is related to ethnocentrism and anachronism: the author shows that they both represent simultaneously dangers that must be prevented and unavoidable working tools. The second tension is related to the role of conceptualization and to the difficult choice that social scientists have to make between 'native categories' and 'analytical categories'. Finally, the third dilemma is related to the impossibility for the researcher to find a right distance (juste distance) in relation with the world he studies (be it a familiar or unfamiliar world). The author attempts to show that, although these tensions are often thought of separately, they are in fact closely related, and concern the need for all research projects to be taking the social world as their research object. © The Author(s) 2013.
U2 - 10.1177/0539018412467572
DO - 10.1177/0539018412467572
M3 - Article
SP - 62
EP - 90
JO - Social Science Information
JF - Social Science Information
SN - 0539-0184
ER -