Judges, Litigants, and the Politics of Rights Enforcement in Argentina

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a RevistaArtículo

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

Under what conditions can courts produce political and social change? My claim is that courts can be most consequential when they act in concert with other actors to create political spaces for ongoing discussion and engagement with regard to rights. In explaining judicial impact, I focus on the novel and understudied oversight mechanisms–like follow-up committees and public hearings–that some assertive high courts deploy to monitor adherence to some of their rulings. The analysis is based on comparative case studies of two landmark socioeconomic rights cases handed down by the Argentine Supreme Court. I show that the deployment of oversight mechanisms can create institutional spaces where the court, elected leaders, and private and civil society actors converge to generate change, resulting in greater impact.
Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Número de artículo2
Páginas (desde-hasta)169-187
Número de páginas18
PublicaciónComparative Politics
Volumen50
N.º2
EstadoPublished - 2018

Huella dactilar

Argentina
politics
political change
Supreme Court
civil society
social change
leader

Citar esto

@article{1baddf2cd81a43239602b79ec4610c49,
title = "Judges, Litigants, and the Politics of Rights Enforcement in Argentina",
abstract = "Under what conditions can courts produce political and social change? My claim is that courts can be most consequential when they act in concert with other actors to create political spaces for ongoing discussion and engagement with regard to rights. In explaining judicial impact, I focus on the novel and understudied oversight mechanisms–like follow-up committees and public hearings–that some assertive high courts deploy to monitor adherence to some of their rulings. The analysis is based on comparative case studies of two landmark socioeconomic rights cases handed down by the Argentine Supreme Court. I show that the deployment of oversight mechanisms can create institutional spaces where the court, elected leaders, and private and civil society actors converge to generate change, resulting in greater impact.",
author = "Sandra Botero",
year = "2018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "169--187",
journal = "Comparative Politics",
issn = "0010-4159",
publisher = "City University of New York",
number = "2",

}

Judges, Litigants, and the Politics of Rights Enforcement in Argentina. / Botero, Sandra.

En: Comparative Politics, Vol. 50, N.º 2, 2, 2018, p. 169-187.

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a RevistaArtículo

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judges, Litigants, and the Politics of Rights Enforcement in Argentina

AU - Botero, Sandra

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Under what conditions can courts produce political and social change? My claim is that courts can be most consequential when they act in concert with other actors to create political spaces for ongoing discussion and engagement with regard to rights. In explaining judicial impact, I focus on the novel and understudied oversight mechanisms–like follow-up committees and public hearings–that some assertive high courts deploy to monitor adherence to some of their rulings. The analysis is based on comparative case studies of two landmark socioeconomic rights cases handed down by the Argentine Supreme Court. I show that the deployment of oversight mechanisms can create institutional spaces where the court, elected leaders, and private and civil society actors converge to generate change, resulting in greater impact.

AB - Under what conditions can courts produce political and social change? My claim is that courts can be most consequential when they act in concert with other actors to create political spaces for ongoing discussion and engagement with regard to rights. In explaining judicial impact, I focus on the novel and understudied oversight mechanisms–like follow-up committees and public hearings–that some assertive high courts deploy to monitor adherence to some of their rulings. The analysis is based on comparative case studies of two landmark socioeconomic rights cases handed down by the Argentine Supreme Court. I show that the deployment of oversight mechanisms can create institutional spaces where the court, elected leaders, and private and civil society actors converge to generate change, resulting in greater impact.

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 169

EP - 187

JO - Comparative Politics

JF - Comparative Politics

SN - 0010-4159

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -