Have Public Interests Been Forgotten in NAFTA Chapter 11 Foreign Investor/Host State Arbitration-Some: Conclusions from the Judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the Case of Mexico V. Metalclad

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículo

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)189
Número de páginas1
PublicaciónNafta: Law & Business Review of the Americas
Volumen8
EstadoPublicada - ene 2 2002

Citar esto

@article{0852681c1dd646d2b7b725e84c352be3,
title = "Have Public Interests Been Forgotten in NAFTA Chapter 11 Foreign Investor/Host State Arbitration-Some: Conclusions from the Judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the Case of Mexico V. Metalclad",
author = "Hector Olasolo",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "2",
language = "Ingl{\'e}s",
volume = "8",
pages = "189",
journal = "Nafta: Law & Business Review of the Americas",
issn = "2212-0750",
publisher = "Southern Methodist University",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Have Public Interests Been Forgotten in NAFTA Chapter 11 Foreign Investor/Host State Arbitration-Some

T2 - Conclusions from the Judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the Case of Mexico V. Metalclad

AU - Olasolo, Hector

PY - 2002/1/2

Y1 - 2002/1/2

M3 - Artículo

VL - 8

SP - 189

JO - Nafta: Law & Business Review of the Americas

JF - Nafta: Law & Business Review of the Americas

SN - 2212-0750

ER -