TY - JOUR
T1 - Eyewitness memory distortion following co-witness discussion: A replication of Garry, French, Kinzett, and Mori (2008) in ten countries.
AU - Ito, Hiroshi
AU - Barzykowski, Krystian
AU - Grzesik, Magdalena
AU - Gülgöz, Sami
AU - Gürdere, Ceren
AU - Janssen, Steve M.J.
AU - Khor, Jessie
AU - Rowthorn, Harriet
AU - Wade, Kimberley A.
AU - Luna, Karlos
AU - Albuquerque, Pedro B.
AU - Kumar, Devvarta
AU - Singh, Arman Deep
AU - Cecconello, William Weber
AU - Cadavid, Sara
AU - Laird, Nicole C.
AU - Baldassari, Mario J.
AU - Lindsay, D. Stephen
AU - Mori, Kazuo
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI No. 25280050) to Kazuo Mori and a grant from Aichi University (KENKYUJOSEI No. C-180) to Hiroshi Ito. Kazuo Mori was also supported by the Joint Research Grant 2017 from the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan to Matsumoto University for cooperative research with Aichi University. While conducting the study and writing of the manuscript, Krystian Barzykowski was supported by a grant from the National Science Centre, Poland [No.: 2015/19/D/HS6/00641]. Nicole Laird's work on this project was supported by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant to D. Stephen Lindsay. This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI No. 25280050) to Kazuo Mori and a grant from Aichi University (KENKYUJOSEI No. C-180) to Hiroshi Ito. Kazuo Mori was also supported by the Joint Research Grant 2017 from the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan to Matsumoto University for cooperative research with Aichi University. While conducting the study and writing of the manuscript, Krystian Barzykowski was supported by a grant from the National Science Centre, Poland [No.: 2015/19/D/HS6/00641]. Nicole Laird's work on this project was supported by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant to D. Stephen Lindsay.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - We examined the replicability of the co-witness suggestibility effect originally reported by Garry et al. (2008) by testing participants from 10 countries (Brazil, Canada, Colombia, India, Japan, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal, Turkey, and the United Kingdom; total N = 486). Pairs of participants sat beside each other, viewing different versions of the same movie while believing that they viewed the same version. Later, participant pairs answered questions collaboratively, which guided them to discuss conflicting details. Finally, participants took a recognition test individually. Each of the 10 samples replicated the Garry et al. finding: Participants often reported on the final test a non-witnessed answer that their co-witness had stated during the collaboration phase. Such co-witness suggestibility errors were especially likely when the witness had not disputed the co-witness's report during the collaboration phase. The results demonstrate the replicability and generalizability of the co-witness suggestibility effect.
AB - We examined the replicability of the co-witness suggestibility effect originally reported by Garry et al. (2008) by testing participants from 10 countries (Brazil, Canada, Colombia, India, Japan, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal, Turkey, and the United Kingdom; total N = 486). Pairs of participants sat beside each other, viewing different versions of the same movie while believing that they viewed the same version. Later, participant pairs answered questions collaboratively, which guided them to discuss conflicting details. Finally, participants took a recognition test individually. Each of the 10 samples replicated the Garry et al. finding: Participants often reported on the final test a non-witnessed answer that their co-witness had stated during the collaboration phase. Such co-witness suggestibility errors were especially likely when the witness had not disputed the co-witness's report during the collaboration phase. The results demonstrate the replicability and generalizability of the co-witness suggestibility effect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056576672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056576672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85056576672
SN - 2211-3681
VL - 8
SP - 68
EP - 77
JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
IS - 1
ER -