Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World

Tamara A. Trownsell; Arlene B. Tickner; Amaya Querejazu; Jarrad Reddekop; Giorgio Shani; Kosuke Shimizu; Navnita Chadha Behera; Anahita Arian

doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa008

Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World

Título traducido de la contribución: Diferir sobre la diferencia: RI relacionales de todo el mundo

Tamara A. Trownsell, Arlene B. Tickner, Amaya Querejazu, Jarrad Reddekop, Giorgio Shani, Kosuke Shimizu, Navnita Chadha Behera, Anahita Arian

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo de Investigación › revisión exhaustiva

41 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Las bases ontológicas de la diferencia, uno de los principales temas que se abordan en el estudio de las relaciones internacionales, no han sido cuestionadas lo suficiente. En este foro, exploramos cómo las presuposiciones existenciales arraigadas a la lógica relacional proveen un conjunto de herramientas completamente distinto que nos permite percibir, interpretar y relacionar la similitud y la diferencia de otra forma. Tomando como referencia las cosmovivencias encontradas en los Andes, Asia del Sur, Asia Oriental y Oriente Medio, en las seis colaboraciones se analiza cómo las hipótesis existenciales influyen en la forma en la que estudiamos la diferencia como teóricos, investigadores y docentes. En esta primera

Título traducido de la contribución	Diferir sobre la diferencia: RI relacionales de todo el mundo
Idioma original	Inglés estadounidense
Páginas (desde-hasta)	25–64
Número de páginas	40
Publicación	International Studies Perspectives
Volumen	22
N.º	1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa008 https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa008
Estado	Publicada - feb. 1 2021

Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus

Geografía, planificación y desarrollo
Ciencias políticas y relaciones internacionales

Acceder al documento

https://academic.oup.com/isp/article-abstract/22/1/25/5897224?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

@article{88fa818f0a3b489bacdc0f0718a18cba,

title = "Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World",

abstract = "Difference, a central concern to the study of international relations (IR), has not had its ontological foundations adequately disrupted. This forum explores how existential assumptions rooted in relational logics provide a significantly distinct set of tools that drive us to re-orient how we perceive, interpret, and engage both similarity and difference. Taking their cues from cosmological commitments originating in the Andes, South Asia, East Asia, and the Middle East, the six contributions explore how our existential assumptions affect the ways in which we deal with difference as theorists, researchers, and teachers. This initial conversation pinpoints key content and foci of future relational work in IR.",

author = "Trownsell, {Tamara A.} and Tickner, {Arlene B.} and Amaya Querejazu and Jarrad Reddekop and Giorgio Shani and Kosuke Shimizu and Behera, {Navnita Chadha} and Anahita Arian",

year = "2021",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa008",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "22",

pages = "25–64",

journal = "International Studies Perspectives",

issn = "1528-3577",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differing about Difference

T2 - Relational IR from around the World

AU - Trownsell, Tamara A.

AU - Tickner, Arlene B.

AU - Querejazu, Amaya

AU - Reddekop, Jarrad

AU - Shani, Giorgio

AU - Shimizu, Kosuke

AU - Behera, Navnita Chadha

AU - Arian, Anahita

PY - 2021/2/1

Y1 - 2021/2/1

N2 - Difference, a central concern to the study of international relations (IR), has not had its ontological foundations adequately disrupted. This forum explores how existential assumptions rooted in relational logics provide a significantly distinct set of tools that drive us to re-orient how we perceive, interpret, and engage both similarity and difference. Taking their cues from cosmological commitments originating in the Andes, South Asia, East Asia, and the Middle East, the six contributions explore how our existential assumptions affect the ways in which we deal with difference as theorists, researchers, and teachers. This initial conversation pinpoints key content and foci of future relational work in IR.

AB - Difference, a central concern to the study of international relations (IR), has not had its ontological foundations adequately disrupted. This forum explores how existential assumptions rooted in relational logics provide a significantly distinct set of tools that drive us to re-orient how we perceive, interpret, and engage both similarity and difference. Taking their cues from cosmological commitments originating in the Andes, South Asia, East Asia, and the Middle East, the six contributions explore how our existential assumptions affect the ways in which we deal with difference as theorists, researchers, and teachers. This initial conversation pinpoints key content and foci of future relational work in IR.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102688329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102688329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa008

DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa008

M3 - Research Article

AN - SCOPUS:85102688329

SN - 1528-3577

VL - 22

SP - 25

EP - 64

JO - International Studies Perspectives

JF - International Studies Perspectives

IS - 1

ER -

Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World

Resumen

Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto