TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction of the curve of spee using clear aligner therapy
T2 - A finite element analysis of three lower anterior intrusion protocols
AU - Guerrero-Vargas, José Alejandro
AU - Montalvany-Antonucci, Carina Cristina
AU - Velez-Muriel, Sandra Melisa
AU - Couto Figueiredo, Natália
AU - Macari, Soraia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2026 Guerrero-Vargas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - BACKGROUND: Correction of the curve of Spee (COS) often requires lower anterior intrusion, which remains one of the least accurate tooth movements in clear aligner therapy (CAT). This limited accuracy may be influenced by the anchorage system or the design of the intrusion strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the movement trends and stress distribution in the lower anterior teeth subjected to three different intrusion protocols using finite element analysis (FEA). METHODS: Three-dimensional models of the mandibular dentition, periodontal ligaments (PDLs), bone, attachments, and clear aligners were constructed using Materialise Mimics and Materialise 3-matic software. The assembly of the anatomical structures was developed using Autodesk Inventor, and FEA was performed using FeBio software. Three protocols with different anterior intrusion designs were evaluated: S1 (simulation 1) - intrusion displacements of 0.25 mm were applied simultaneously to the canines, central, and lateral incisors; S2 (simulation 2) - intrusion displacements of 0.25 mm were applied only to the lateral and central incisors; S3 (simulation 3) - intrusion displacements of 0.25 mm were applied only to the canines. Total displacement, equivalent strain, and the distribution of minimum and maximum principal stresses were analyzed. RESULTS: Simultaneous intrusion (S1) produced the most balanced movement with the lowest stress in the target teeth and controlled bone displacement. Intruding only the incisors (S2) increased PDL stress and anchorage extrusion but also caused minor canine intrusion, indicating force propagation through the aligner. Canine-only intrusion (S3) elevated stress in the canines and produced slight incisor intrusion. Posterior teeth functioned effectively as anchorage in all simulations. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous intrusion of canines and incisors is the most biomechanically efficient approach for COS correction with aligners, minimizing stress and unwanted side effects. Isolated intrusion of either group requires careful planning to manage secondary movements and anchorage control.
AB - BACKGROUND: Correction of the curve of Spee (COS) often requires lower anterior intrusion, which remains one of the least accurate tooth movements in clear aligner therapy (CAT). This limited accuracy may be influenced by the anchorage system or the design of the intrusion strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the movement trends and stress distribution in the lower anterior teeth subjected to three different intrusion protocols using finite element analysis (FEA). METHODS: Three-dimensional models of the mandibular dentition, periodontal ligaments (PDLs), bone, attachments, and clear aligners were constructed using Materialise Mimics and Materialise 3-matic software. The assembly of the anatomical structures was developed using Autodesk Inventor, and FEA was performed using FeBio software. Three protocols with different anterior intrusion designs were evaluated: S1 (simulation 1) - intrusion displacements of 0.25 mm were applied simultaneously to the canines, central, and lateral incisors; S2 (simulation 2) - intrusion displacements of 0.25 mm were applied only to the lateral and central incisors; S3 (simulation 3) - intrusion displacements of 0.25 mm were applied only to the canines. Total displacement, equivalent strain, and the distribution of minimum and maximum principal stresses were analyzed. RESULTS: Simultaneous intrusion (S1) produced the most balanced movement with the lowest stress in the target teeth and controlled bone displacement. Intruding only the incisors (S2) increased PDL stress and anchorage extrusion but also caused minor canine intrusion, indicating force propagation through the aligner. Canine-only intrusion (S3) elevated stress in the canines and produced slight incisor intrusion. Posterior teeth functioned effectively as anchorage in all simulations. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous intrusion of canines and incisors is the most biomechanically efficient approach for COS correction with aligners, minimizing stress and unwanted side effects. Isolated intrusion of either group requires careful planning to manage secondary movements and anchorage control.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028832074
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028832074#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0341447
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0341447
M3 - Research Article
C2 - 41592071
AN - SCOPUS:105028832074
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 21
SP - e0341447
JO - PLOS ONE
JF - PLOS ONE
IS - 1
ER -