Comparing the biomechanical and perceived exertion imposed on workers when using manual mechanical and powered cargo management systems during ladder loading and unloading tasks

Antonio Miguel Cruz; Jessica Murphy; Avneet Kaur Chohan; Daniel Alejandro Quiroga Torres; Laura Catalina Izquierdo Martinez; Diana Carolina Rincon Martinez; Lili Liu; Adriana Maria Rios Rincon

doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103199

Comparing the biomechanical and perceived exertion imposed on workers when using manual mechanical and powered cargo management systems during ladder loading and unloading tasks

Título traducido de la contribución: Comparación del esfuerzo biomecánico y percibido impuesto a los trabajadores al utilizar sistemas mecánicos manuales y motorizados de gestión de la carga durante las tareas de carga y descarga de escaleras.

Antonio Miguel Cruz
, Jessica Murphy
, Avneet Kaur Chohan
, Daniel Alejandro Quiroga Torres
, Laura Catalina Izquierdo Martinez
, Diana Carolina Rincon Martinez
, Lili Liu
, Adriana Maria Rios Rincon

Producción científica: Contribución a revista › Artículo de Investigación › revisión exhaustiva

4 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio era comparar los efectos de dos sistemas diferentes de gestión de cargas (un sistema motorizado, el RazerLift®, y un sistema tradicional) sobre el esfuerzo biomecánico y percibido experimentado por los trabajadores al realizar tareas rutinarias de carga y descarga de escaleras. Siete trabajadores experimentados realizaron tareas de carga y descarga de escaleras. En comparación con el sistema tradicional, la fuerza de compresión estática acumulada en la zona lumbar se redujo en un 57,9% (p < 0,05) y un 39,3% (p < 0,05) cuando se utilizó el RazerLift® para realizar tareas de carga y descarga de escaleras, respectivamente. En general, los momentos acumulativos de flexión del hombro se redujeron en un 34,8% (p < 0,05) y un 41,3% (p < 0,05) cuando se utilizó el RazerLift® para realizar las tareas de carga y descarga de la escalera, respectivamente. En general, la puntuación del esfuerzo percibido se redujo en un 250,1% (p < 0,05) cuando se utilizó el RazerLift® en comparación con el sistema tradicional. En conclusión, nuestro estudio demostró que el RazerLift® reduce la exposición biomecánica y psicofísica asociada al desarrollo de trastornos musculoesqueléticos durante la realización de tareas de carga y descarga de escaleras.

Título traducido de la contribución	Comparación del esfuerzo biomecánico y percibido impuesto a los trabajadores al utilizar sistemas mecánicos manuales y motorizados de gestión de la carga durante las tareas de carga y descarga de escaleras.
Idioma original	Inglés estadounidense
Número de artículo	103199
Páginas (desde-hasta)	1-13
Número de páginas	13
Publicación	International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Volumen	86
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103199
Estado	Publicada - nov. 2021

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

ODS 3: Salud y bienestar

Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus

Ingeniería biomédica
Salud pública, medioambiental y laboral

Acceder al documento

10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103199Licencia: CC BY

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814121001177Licencia: CC BY

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Comparación del esfuerzo biomecánico y percibido impuesto a los trabajadores al utilizar sistemas mecánicos manuales y motorizados de gestión de la carga durante las tareas de carga y descarga de escaleras.'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto

Miguel Cruz, A., Murphy, J., Kaur Chohan, A., Quiroga Torres, D. A., Izquierdo Martinez, L. C., Rincon Martinez, D. C., Liu, L., & Rios Rincon, A. M. (2021). Comparing the biomechanical and perceived exertion imposed on workers when using manual mechanical and powered cargo management systems during ladder loading and unloading tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 86, 1-13. Artículo 103199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103199

@article{b88845552b554c0aac78197ff6b96ea4,

title = "Comparing the biomechanical and perceived exertion imposed on workers when using manual mechanical and powered cargo management systems during ladder loading and unloading tasks",

abstract = "This study aimed to compare the effects of two different cargo management systems (one powered system, i.e., the RazerLift{\textregistered}, and one Traditional system) on the biomechanical and perceived exertion experienced by workers when performing routine ladder loading and unloading tasks. Seven experienced workers performed ladder loading and unloading tasks. Compared to when the Traditional system was being used, the cumulative static low-back compression force was reduced by 57.9\% (p < 0.05) and 39.3\% (p < 0.05) when the RazerLift{\textregistered} was being used to perform ladder loading and unloading tasks, respectively. Overall, the cumulative shoulder flexor moments were reduced by 34.8\% (p < 0.05) and 41.3\% (p < 0.05) when the RazerLift{\textregistered} was being used to perform ladder loading and unloading tasks, respectively. Overall, the perceived exertion score was reduced by 250.1\% (p < 0.05) when the RazerLift{\textregistered} was being used compared to the Traditional system. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the RazerLift{\textregistered} reduces the biomechanical and psychophysical exposure associated with the development of musculoskeletal disorders while performing ladder loading and unloading tasks.",

author = "\{Miguel Cruz\}, Antonio and Jessica Murphy and \{Kaur Chohan\}, Avneet and \{Quiroga Torres\}, \{Daniel Alejandro\} and \{Izquierdo Martinez\}, \{Laura Catalina\} and \{Rincon Martinez\}, \{Diana Carolina\} and Lili Liu and \{Rios Rincon\}, \{Adriana Maria\}",

year = "2021",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103199",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "86",

pages = "1--13",

journal = "International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics",

issn = "0169-8141",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Miguel Cruz, A, Murphy, J, Kaur Chohan, A, Quiroga Torres, DA, Izquierdo Martinez, LC, Rincon Martinez, DC, Liu, L & Rios Rincon, AM 2021, 'Comparing the biomechanical and perceived exertion imposed on workers when using manual mechanical and powered cargo management systems during ladder loading and unloading tasks', International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 86, 103199, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103199

Comparing the biomechanical and perceived exertion imposed on workers when using manual mechanical and powered cargo management systems during ladder loading and unloading tasks. / Miguel Cruz, Antonio; Murphy, Jessica; Kaur Chohan, Avneet et al.
En: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 86, 103199, 11.2021, p. 1-13.

Producción científica: Contribución a revista › Artículo de Investigación › revisión exhaustiva

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the biomechanical and perceived exertion imposed on workers when using manual mechanical and powered cargo management systems during ladder loading and unloading tasks

AU - Miguel Cruz, Antonio

AU - Murphy, Jessica

AU - Kaur Chohan, Avneet

AU - Quiroga Torres, Daniel Alejandro

AU - Izquierdo Martinez, Laura Catalina

AU - Rincon Martinez, Diana Carolina

AU - Liu, Lili

AU - Rios Rincon, Adriana Maria

PY - 2021/11

Y1 - 2021/11

N2 - This study aimed to compare the effects of two different cargo management systems (one powered system, i.e., the RazerLift®, and one Traditional system) on the biomechanical and perceived exertion experienced by workers when performing routine ladder loading and unloading tasks. Seven experienced workers performed ladder loading and unloading tasks. Compared to when the Traditional system was being used, the cumulative static low-back compression force was reduced by 57.9% (p < 0.05) and 39.3% (p < 0.05) when the RazerLift® was being used to perform ladder loading and unloading tasks, respectively. Overall, the cumulative shoulder flexor moments were reduced by 34.8% (p < 0.05) and 41.3% (p < 0.05) when the RazerLift® was being used to perform ladder loading and unloading tasks, respectively. Overall, the perceived exertion score was reduced by 250.1% (p < 0.05) when the RazerLift® was being used compared to the Traditional system. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the RazerLift® reduces the biomechanical and psychophysical exposure associated with the development of musculoskeletal disorders while performing ladder loading and unloading tasks.

AB - This study aimed to compare the effects of two different cargo management systems (one powered system, i.e., the RazerLift®, and one Traditional system) on the biomechanical and perceived exertion experienced by workers when performing routine ladder loading and unloading tasks. Seven experienced workers performed ladder loading and unloading tasks. Compared to when the Traditional system was being used, the cumulative static low-back compression force was reduced by 57.9% (p < 0.05) and 39.3% (p < 0.05) when the RazerLift® was being used to perform ladder loading and unloading tasks, respectively. Overall, the cumulative shoulder flexor moments were reduced by 34.8% (p < 0.05) and 41.3% (p < 0.05) when the RazerLift® was being used to perform ladder loading and unloading tasks, respectively. Overall, the perceived exertion score was reduced by 250.1% (p < 0.05) when the RazerLift® was being used compared to the Traditional system. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the RazerLift® reduces the biomechanical and psychophysical exposure associated with the development of musculoskeletal disorders while performing ladder loading and unloading tasks.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103199

DO - 10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103199

M3 - Research Article

SN - 0169-8141

VL - 86

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

JF - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

M1 - 103199

ER -

Miguel Cruz A, Murphy J, Kaur Chohan A, Quiroga Torres DA, Izquierdo Martinez LC, Rincon Martinez DC et al. Comparing the biomechanical and perceived exertion imposed on workers when using manual mechanical and powered cargo management systems during ladder loading and unloading tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2021 nov.;86:1-13. 103199. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103199

Comparing the biomechanical and perceived exertion imposed on workers when using manual mechanical and powered cargo management systems during ladder loading and unloading tasks

Resumen

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus

Acceder al documento

Huella

Premios

Citar esto