An ecosystem service-disservice ratio: Using composite indicators to assess the net benefits of urban trees

Andrew Speak, Francisco J. Escobedo, Alessio Russo, Stefan Zerbe

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a RevistaArtículo

Resumen

Considering ecosystem disservices (EDS) of urban forests alongside the services (ES) can lead to better-informed decisions about tree species selection and placement in cities. Finding a common assessment framework, that does not rely on a financial model, can be tricky, and many studies consider, but do not include, EDS in their tree appraisals. Compound indicators represent a means to neatly combine disparate ecosystem data into one meaningful metric. In this study quantitative field measurements, model outputs, and categorical data relating to some of the major ES and EDS of the urban forest of Meran, Italy, were successfully compressed into a single unit, overcoming epistemological boundaries surrounding different urban ecosystem valuation methods. Several methods of compound indicator construction were considered and uncertainty and sensitivity analysis carried out on the species rankings which were produced. Significant differences in ES/EDS provision were observed between trees on public and private land. Spatial analysis revealed hotspots of high ES provision and low EDS provision, and vice versa. With correct use, compound indicators can stand alongside other methods of measuring and valuing positive and negative aspects of urban ecosystems.

IdiomaEnglish (US)
Páginas544-553
Número de páginas10
PublicaciónEcological Indicators
Volumen95
DOI
EstadoPublished - dic 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Citar esto

@article{5930bfd6fbf8474881e181c089fbdf8e,
title = "An ecosystem service-disservice ratio: Using composite indicators to assess the net benefits of urban trees",
abstract = "Considering ecosystem disservices (EDS) of urban forests alongside the services (ES) can lead to better-informed decisions about tree species selection and placement in cities. Finding a common assessment framework, that does not rely on a financial model, can be tricky, and many studies consider, but do not include, EDS in their tree appraisals. Compound indicators represent a means to neatly combine disparate ecosystem data into one meaningful metric. In this study quantitative field measurements, model outputs, and categorical data relating to some of the major ES and EDS of the urban forest of Meran, Italy, were successfully compressed into a single unit, overcoming epistemological boundaries surrounding different urban ecosystem valuation methods. Several methods of compound indicator construction were considered and uncertainty and sensitivity analysis carried out on the species rankings which were produced. Significant differences in ES/EDS provision were observed between trees on public and private land. Spatial analysis revealed hotspots of high ES provision and low EDS provision, and vice versa. With correct use, compound indicators can stand alongside other methods of measuring and valuing positive and negative aspects of urban ecosystems.",
author = "Andrew Speak and Escobedo, {Francisco J.} and Alessio Russo and Stefan Zerbe",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "544--553",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

An ecosystem service-disservice ratio : Using composite indicators to assess the net benefits of urban trees. / Speak, Andrew; Escobedo, Francisco J.; Russo, Alessio; Zerbe, Stefan.

En: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 95, 01.12.2018, p. 544-553.

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a RevistaArtículo

TY - JOUR

T1 - An ecosystem service-disservice ratio

T2 - Ecological Indicators

AU - Speak, Andrew

AU - Escobedo, Francisco J.

AU - Russo, Alessio

AU - Zerbe, Stefan

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Considering ecosystem disservices (EDS) of urban forests alongside the services (ES) can lead to better-informed decisions about tree species selection and placement in cities. Finding a common assessment framework, that does not rely on a financial model, can be tricky, and many studies consider, but do not include, EDS in their tree appraisals. Compound indicators represent a means to neatly combine disparate ecosystem data into one meaningful metric. In this study quantitative field measurements, model outputs, and categorical data relating to some of the major ES and EDS of the urban forest of Meran, Italy, were successfully compressed into a single unit, overcoming epistemological boundaries surrounding different urban ecosystem valuation methods. Several methods of compound indicator construction were considered and uncertainty and sensitivity analysis carried out on the species rankings which were produced. Significant differences in ES/EDS provision were observed between trees on public and private land. Spatial analysis revealed hotspots of high ES provision and low EDS provision, and vice versa. With correct use, compound indicators can stand alongside other methods of measuring and valuing positive and negative aspects of urban ecosystems.

AB - Considering ecosystem disservices (EDS) of urban forests alongside the services (ES) can lead to better-informed decisions about tree species selection and placement in cities. Finding a common assessment framework, that does not rely on a financial model, can be tricky, and many studies consider, but do not include, EDS in their tree appraisals. Compound indicators represent a means to neatly combine disparate ecosystem data into one meaningful metric. In this study quantitative field measurements, model outputs, and categorical data relating to some of the major ES and EDS of the urban forest of Meran, Italy, were successfully compressed into a single unit, overcoming epistemological boundaries surrounding different urban ecosystem valuation methods. Several methods of compound indicator construction were considered and uncertainty and sensitivity analysis carried out on the species rankings which were produced. Significant differences in ES/EDS provision were observed between trees on public and private land. Spatial analysis revealed hotspots of high ES provision and low EDS provision, and vice versa. With correct use, compound indicators can stand alongside other methods of measuring and valuing positive and negative aspects of urban ecosystems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051122977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051122977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.048

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.048

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 544

EP - 553

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -