TY - JOUR
T1 - A multinational megastudy of the effects of gratitude practices on subjective well-being
AU - Coles, Nicholas A.
AU - Dang, Annabel V.
AU - Oishi, Shigehiro
AU - Adade, Abigail
AU - Akintola, Aderonke A.
AU - de Souza, Beatriz B.
AU - Gjoneska, Biljana
AU - Harris, Christine R.
AU - Kesarwani, Dev
AU - Pisareva, Dinara
AU - Tee, Eugene Y.J.
AU - Lyann, Goo
AU - Gunaydin, Gul
AU - Lee, Gyuri
AU - Yu, Hongbo
AU - Choi, Hyewon
AU - Chika Chukwuorji, John Bosco
AU - Klitgaard, Karoline
AU - Behnke, Maciej
AU - Bergquist, Magnus
AU - Engeset, Marit Gunda Gundersen
AU - Taephant, Nattasuda
AU - Durnev, Nikita
AU - Spasovski, Ognen
AU - Boggio, Paulo Sergio
AU - Singh, Ram Manohar
AU - Irmel, Robin
AU - Barbosa, Sergio
AU - Zhao, Shangcheng
AU - Acar-Burkay, Sinem
AU - Pfattheicher, Stefan
AU - Ishii, Tatsunori
AU - Goh Weng Yew, Victor
AU - Dzokoto, Vivian
AU - Soyalan, Zeynep
AU - McCullough, Michael E.
PY - 2026/5/19
Y1 - 2026/5/19
N2 - Scholars have observed people from a variety of cultures using a variety of gratitude-related practices to change their emotions, outlooks, and social relationships. Across 34 countries purposively sampled to cover a broad set of cross-cultural differences (total N = 10,696), we experimentally tested the effects of 6 brief gratitude interventions on subjective moods, life outlooks, and social evaluations. Compared to 3 control tasks, gratitude practices immediately produced theorized improvements in positive affect (d = 0.37), negative affect (d = -0.22), optimism (d = 0.24), life satisfaction (d = 0.12), indebtedness (d = 0.15), and envy (d = -0.16). Notably, these effects varied across different gratitude practices (0.00 < τpractice < 0.08) and countries (0.10 < τcountry < 0.19). For instance, based on existing evidence, stakeholders can expect gratitude interventions deployed in a randomly selected country to improve positive affect-but not our other measured outcomes. To guide future inquiry into why this might be the case, we provide exploratory Bayesian estimates of the importance of 12 cross-cultural differences.
AB - Scholars have observed people from a variety of cultures using a variety of gratitude-related practices to change their emotions, outlooks, and social relationships. Across 34 countries purposively sampled to cover a broad set of cross-cultural differences (total N = 10,696), we experimentally tested the effects of 6 brief gratitude interventions on subjective moods, life outlooks, and social evaluations. Compared to 3 control tasks, gratitude practices immediately produced theorized improvements in positive affect (d = 0.37), negative affect (d = -0.22), optimism (d = 0.24), life satisfaction (d = 0.12), indebtedness (d = 0.15), and envy (d = -0.16). Notably, these effects varied across different gratitude practices (0.00 < τpractice < 0.08) and countries (0.10 < τcountry < 0.19). For instance, based on existing evidence, stakeholders can expect gratitude interventions deployed in a randomly selected country to improve positive affect-but not our other measured outcomes. To guide future inquiry into why this might be the case, we provide exploratory Bayesian estimates of the importance of 12 cross-cultural differences.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105038531287
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105038531287#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2537789123
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2537789123
M3 - Research Article
C2 - 42113986
AN - SCOPUS:105038531287
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 123
SP - e2537789123
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 20
ER -