TY - JOUR
T1 - A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the rural population in Colombia
AU - Goossens, Anne J.M.
AU - Cheung, Kei Long
AU - Sijstermans, Eric
AU - Conde, Rafael
AU - Gonzalez, Javier G.R.
AU - Hiligsmann, Mickael
N1 - Goossens, A. J. M., Cheung, K. L., Sijstermans, E., Conde, R., Gonzalez, J. G. R., & Hiligsmann, M. (2020). A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the rural population in colombia. Journal of Medical Economics, 23(8), 803-811. doi:10.1080/13696998.2020.1735398
PY - 2020/8/2
Y1 - 2020/8/2
N2 - Aim: To elicit patients’ preferences for HIV treatment of the rural population in Colombia. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE), conducted in a HIV clinic in Bogotá, was used to examine the trade-off between five HIV treatment attributes: effect on life expectancy, effect on physical activity, risk of moderate side-effects, accessibility to clinic, and economic costs to access controls. Attributes selection was based on literature review, expert consultation and a focus group with six patients. An efficient experimental design was used to define two versions of the questionnaire with each of 12 choice sets and a dominance task was added to check reliability. A mixed logit model was then used to analyse the data and sub-group analyses were conducted on the basis of age, gender, education, and sexual preference. Results: A total of 129 HIV patients were included for analysis. For all treatment attributes, significant differences between at least two levels were observed, meaning that all attributes were significant predictors of choice. Patients valued the effect on physical activity (conditional relative importance of 27.5%) and the effect on life expectancy (26.0%) the most. Sub-group analyses regard age and education showed significant differences: younger patients and high educated patients valued the effect on physical activity the most important, whereas older patients mostly valued the effect on life expectancy and low educated patients mostly valued the accessibility to clinic. Limitations: One potential limitation is selection bias, as only patients from one HIV clinic were reached. Additionally, questionnaires were partly administered in the waiting rooms, which potentially led to noise in the data. Conclusions: This study suggests that all HIV treatment characteristics included in this DCE were important and that HIV patients from rural Colombia valued short-term efficacy (i.e. effect on physical activity) and long-term efficacy (i.e. effect on life expectancy) the most.
AB - Aim: To elicit patients’ preferences for HIV treatment of the rural population in Colombia. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE), conducted in a HIV clinic in Bogotá, was used to examine the trade-off between five HIV treatment attributes: effect on life expectancy, effect on physical activity, risk of moderate side-effects, accessibility to clinic, and economic costs to access controls. Attributes selection was based on literature review, expert consultation and a focus group with six patients. An efficient experimental design was used to define two versions of the questionnaire with each of 12 choice sets and a dominance task was added to check reliability. A mixed logit model was then used to analyse the data and sub-group analyses were conducted on the basis of age, gender, education, and sexual preference. Results: A total of 129 HIV patients were included for analysis. For all treatment attributes, significant differences between at least two levels were observed, meaning that all attributes were significant predictors of choice. Patients valued the effect on physical activity (conditional relative importance of 27.5%) and the effect on life expectancy (26.0%) the most. Sub-group analyses regard age and education showed significant differences: younger patients and high educated patients valued the effect on physical activity the most important, whereas older patients mostly valued the effect on life expectancy and low educated patients mostly valued the accessibility to clinic. Limitations: One potential limitation is selection bias, as only patients from one HIV clinic were reached. Additionally, questionnaires were partly administered in the waiting rooms, which potentially led to noise in the data. Conclusions: This study suggests that all HIV treatment characteristics included in this DCE were important and that HIV patients from rural Colombia valued short-term efficacy (i.e. effect on physical activity) and long-term efficacy (i.e. effect on life expectancy) the most.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082805973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082805973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13696998.2020.1735398
DO - 10.1080/13696998.2020.1735398
M3 - Research Article
C2 - 32098539
AN - SCOPUS:85082805973
SN - 1369-6998
VL - 23
SP - 803
EP - 811
JO - Journal of Medical Economics
JF - Journal of Medical Economics
IS - 8
ER -