Valuation structure in first-price and least-revenue auctions: An experimental investigation

Diego Aycinena, Rimvydas Baltaduonis, Lucas Rentschler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In many auctions the valuation structure involves both private and common value elements. Existing experimental evidence (e.g. Goeree and Offerman in Am. Econ. Rev. 92(3):625–643, 2002) demonstrates that first-price auctions with this valuation structure tend to be inefficient, and inexperienced subjects tend to bid above the break-even bidding threshold. In this paper, we compare first-price auctions with an alternative auction mechanism: the least-revenue auction. This auction mechanism shifts the risk regarding the common value of the good to the auctioneer. Such a shift is desirable when ex post negative payoffs for the winning bidder results in unfulfilled contracts, as is often the case in infrastructure concessions contracts. We directly compare these two auction formats within two valuation structures: (1) pure common value and (2) common value with a private cost. We find that, relative to first-price auctions, bidding above the break-even bidding threshold is significantly less prevalent in least-revenue auctions regardless of valuation structure. As a result, revenue in first-price auctions is higher than in least-revenue auctions, contrary to theory. Further, when there are private and common value components, least-revenue auctions are significantly more efficient than first-price auctions.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-128
Number of pages29
JournalExperimental Economics
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Auctions
Revenue
First-price auction
Common values
Bidding
Private values
Bid
Concession contracts
Costs

Cite this

Aycinena, Diego ; Baltaduonis, Rimvydas ; Rentschler, Lucas. / Valuation structure in first-price and least-revenue auctions: An experimental investigation. In: Experimental Economics. 2014 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 100-128.
@article{b696a529f6624fffa08c562f6b664176,
title = "Valuation structure in first-price and least-revenue auctions: An experimental investigation",
abstract = "In many auctions the valuation structure involves both private and common value elements. Existing experimental evidence (e.g. Goeree and Offerman in Am. Econ. Rev. 92(3):625–643, 2002) demonstrates that first-price auctions with this valuation structure tend to be inefficient, and inexperienced subjects tend to bid above the break-even bidding threshold. In this paper, we compare first-price auctions with an alternative auction mechanism: the least-revenue auction. This auction mechanism shifts the risk regarding the common value of the good to the auctioneer. Such a shift is desirable when ex post negative payoffs for the winning bidder results in unfulfilled contracts, as is often the case in infrastructure concessions contracts. We directly compare these two auction formats within two valuation structures: (1) pure common value and (2) common value with a private cost. We find that, relative to first-price auctions, bidding above the break-even bidding threshold is significantly less prevalent in least-revenue auctions regardless of valuation structure. As a result, revenue in first-price auctions is higher than in least-revenue auctions, contrary to theory. Further, when there are private and common value components, least-revenue auctions are significantly more efficient than first-price auctions.",
author = "Diego Aycinena and Rimvydas Baltaduonis and Lucas Rentschler",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10683-013-9359-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "100--128",
journal = "Experimental Economics",
issn = "1386-4157",
publisher = "Springer US",
number = "1",

}

Valuation structure in first-price and least-revenue auctions: An experimental investigation. / Aycinena, Diego; Baltaduonis, Rimvydas; Rentschler, Lucas.

In: Experimental Economics, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2014, p. 100-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valuation structure in first-price and least-revenue auctions: An experimental investigation

AU - Aycinena, Diego

AU - Baltaduonis, Rimvydas

AU - Rentschler, Lucas

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In many auctions the valuation structure involves both private and common value elements. Existing experimental evidence (e.g. Goeree and Offerman in Am. Econ. Rev. 92(3):625–643, 2002) demonstrates that first-price auctions with this valuation structure tend to be inefficient, and inexperienced subjects tend to bid above the break-even bidding threshold. In this paper, we compare first-price auctions with an alternative auction mechanism: the least-revenue auction. This auction mechanism shifts the risk regarding the common value of the good to the auctioneer. Such a shift is desirable when ex post negative payoffs for the winning bidder results in unfulfilled contracts, as is often the case in infrastructure concessions contracts. We directly compare these two auction formats within two valuation structures: (1) pure common value and (2) common value with a private cost. We find that, relative to first-price auctions, bidding above the break-even bidding threshold is significantly less prevalent in least-revenue auctions regardless of valuation structure. As a result, revenue in first-price auctions is higher than in least-revenue auctions, contrary to theory. Further, when there are private and common value components, least-revenue auctions are significantly more efficient than first-price auctions.

AB - In many auctions the valuation structure involves both private and common value elements. Existing experimental evidence (e.g. Goeree and Offerman in Am. Econ. Rev. 92(3):625–643, 2002) demonstrates that first-price auctions with this valuation structure tend to be inefficient, and inexperienced subjects tend to bid above the break-even bidding threshold. In this paper, we compare first-price auctions with an alternative auction mechanism: the least-revenue auction. This auction mechanism shifts the risk regarding the common value of the good to the auctioneer. Such a shift is desirable when ex post negative payoffs for the winning bidder results in unfulfilled contracts, as is often the case in infrastructure concessions contracts. We directly compare these two auction formats within two valuation structures: (1) pure common value and (2) common value with a private cost. We find that, relative to first-price auctions, bidding above the break-even bidding threshold is significantly less prevalent in least-revenue auctions regardless of valuation structure. As a result, revenue in first-price auctions is higher than in least-revenue auctions, contrary to theory. Further, when there are private and common value components, least-revenue auctions are significantly more efficient than first-price auctions.

U2 - 10.1007/s10683-013-9359-7

DO - 10.1007/s10683-013-9359-7

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 100

EP - 128

JO - Experimental Economics

JF - Experimental Economics

SN - 1386-4157

IS - 1

ER -