TY - JOUR
T1 - Transshipments in supply chains
T2 - A behavioral investigation
AU - Villa, Sebastián
AU - Castañeda, Jaime Andrés
N1 - Funding Information:
The research for this paper was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) , grant no. P1TIP1_164985 . We thank Santiago Arango-Aramburo and the Decision Sciences group at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín, for securing access to a lab to run the experiments. We also thank Elena Katok and Gloria Urrea for their critical and constructive view on this paper. We gratefully acknowledge the constructive comments from the review team. All remaining errors are our own.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Behavioral operations studies in inventory management under demand uncertainty have focused on understanding decision-making processes of a single actor. However, interactions among multiple actors have received little attention, despite their importance for the creation of proper policies that improve real operations. We contribute to this literature by experimentally exploring the behavioral biases of retailers’ ordering decisions in a system composed by two symmetric retailers (newsvendors) and an automated supplier, where transshipments between retailers can be used as a strategy to improve the overall supply chain performance. This paper is the first behavioral study that evaluates whether actors coordinate their decisions through transshipment strategies. We analyze the effect of (i) different profitability conditions, (ii) communication and (iii) different behavioral best response heuristics. Results show retailers do not take advantage of transshipments to coordinate the supply chain, and although communication reduces retailers’ ordering biases, coordination does not improve. However, implementing best response heuristics that account for behavioral biases improves supply chain coordination.
AB - Behavioral operations studies in inventory management under demand uncertainty have focused on understanding decision-making processes of a single actor. However, interactions among multiple actors have received little attention, despite their importance for the creation of proper policies that improve real operations. We contribute to this literature by experimentally exploring the behavioral biases of retailers’ ordering decisions in a system composed by two symmetric retailers (newsvendors) and an automated supplier, where transshipments between retailers can be used as a strategy to improve the overall supply chain performance. This paper is the first behavioral study that evaluates whether actors coordinate their decisions through transshipment strategies. We analyze the effect of (i) different profitability conditions, (ii) communication and (iii) different behavioral best response heuristics. Results show retailers do not take advantage of transshipments to coordinate the supply chain, and although communication reduces retailers’ ordering biases, coordination does not improve. However, implementing best response heuristics that account for behavioral biases improves supply chain coordination.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042884339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042884339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.025
DO - 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.025
M3 - Research Article
AN - SCOPUS:85042884339
SN - 0377-2217
VL - 269
SP - 715
EP - 729
JO - European Journal of Operational Research
JF - European Journal of Operational Research
IS - 2
ER -