Abstract
We analyze the effect of adverse health shocks on households’ different expenditure shares using a difference in differences approach. We find that households engage in substitution between health and food spending in response to the negative health shocks. We find substantial heterogeneity in this trade-off between current and future health mediated by access to social protection, job contract type, and location (urban-rural). Households from rural areas, with heads holding informal jobs, and without access to safety nets, are more vulnerable than others. We discuss several policy implications.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages | 1-34 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Spending Responses to Adverse Health Shocks:Evidence from a Panel of Colombian Households'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver