Abstract

The relationship between students’ withdrawal and educational variables has generated a considerable number of publications. As the explosion of information in sciences and integration theories led to creating different curriculum designs, it has been assumed that differences among designs explain academic success and, therefore, students’ retention. However, little attention has been given to examine explicitly how diverse designs influence dropout rates in practice, which questions if decisions to reform curricula are sufficiently informed. This article describes our curriculum reform, which exposes our former and current curriculum designs as having had dissimilar dropout percentages. Furthermore, we aimed to explore the influence of different curriculum designs on students’ dropout rates. The conclusion is that dropout variations may be explained not only because of the curriculum design itself, but also because of the power relationship changes between teachers and students that brought out the design change. Consequently, more research is needed to fully understand the political implications of different curriculum designs and their influence on dropout rates.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Education Online
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Student Dropouts
drop-out
Curriculum
curriculum
student
Students
Information Science
reform
Explosions
academic success
withdrawal
Publications

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

@article{1256f97e91234997b36849bbb06ec5e7,
title = "The influence of different curriculum designs on students’ dropout rate: a case study",
abstract = "The relationship between students’ withdrawal and educational variables has generated a considerable number of publications. As the explosion of information in sciences and integration theories led to creating different curriculum designs, it has been assumed that differences among designs explain academic success and, therefore, students’ retention. However, little attention has been given to examine explicitly how diverse designs influence dropout rates in practice, which questions if decisions to reform curricula are sufficiently informed. This article describes our curriculum reform, which exposes our former and current curriculum designs as having had dissimilar dropout percentages. Furthermore, we aimed to explore the influence of different curriculum designs on students’ dropout rates. The conclusion is that dropout variations may be explained not only because of the curriculum design itself, but also because of the power relationship changes between teachers and students that brought out the design change. Consequently, more research is needed to fully understand the political implications of different curriculum designs and their influence on dropout rates.",
author = "John Vergel and Quintero, {Gustavo A.} and Andres Isaza-Restrepo and {Ortiz Fonseca}, Martha and {Latorre Santos}, Catalina and {Pardo Oviedo}, {Juan Mauricio}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1432963",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Medical Education Online",
issn = "1087-2981",
publisher = "Co-Action Publishing",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of different curriculum designs on students’ dropout rate: a case study

AU - Vergel, John

AU - Quintero, Gustavo A.

AU - Isaza-Restrepo, Andres

AU - Ortiz Fonseca, Martha

AU - Latorre Santos, Catalina

AU - Pardo Oviedo, Juan Mauricio

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - The relationship between students’ withdrawal and educational variables has generated a considerable number of publications. As the explosion of information in sciences and integration theories led to creating different curriculum designs, it has been assumed that differences among designs explain academic success and, therefore, students’ retention. However, little attention has been given to examine explicitly how diverse designs influence dropout rates in practice, which questions if decisions to reform curricula are sufficiently informed. This article describes our curriculum reform, which exposes our former and current curriculum designs as having had dissimilar dropout percentages. Furthermore, we aimed to explore the influence of different curriculum designs on students’ dropout rates. The conclusion is that dropout variations may be explained not only because of the curriculum design itself, but also because of the power relationship changes between teachers and students that brought out the design change. Consequently, more research is needed to fully understand the political implications of different curriculum designs and their influence on dropout rates.

AB - The relationship between students’ withdrawal and educational variables has generated a considerable number of publications. As the explosion of information in sciences and integration theories led to creating different curriculum designs, it has been assumed that differences among designs explain academic success and, therefore, students’ retention. However, little attention has been given to examine explicitly how diverse designs influence dropout rates in practice, which questions if decisions to reform curricula are sufficiently informed. This article describes our curriculum reform, which exposes our former and current curriculum designs as having had dissimilar dropout percentages. Furthermore, we aimed to explore the influence of different curriculum designs on students’ dropout rates. The conclusion is that dropout variations may be explained not only because of the curriculum design itself, but also because of the power relationship changes between teachers and students that brought out the design change. Consequently, more research is needed to fully understand the political implications of different curriculum designs and their influence on dropout rates.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1432963

DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1432963

M3 - Article

JO - Medical Education Online

JF - Medical Education Online

SN - 1087-2981

M1 - 1

ER -