TY - CHAP
T1 - The Content Structure of Science Technology and Innovation Policy—Applying Co-word Analysis to Funding Calls in Colombia
AU - Cortés, Julián D.
AU - Ramírez-Cajiao, María Catalina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - STIP (science, technology, and innovation policy/es) affect how rules, methods and practices are designed and applied to develop basic or applied research within national borders. Literature on STIP has been fertile in multiple streams, such as theoretical/conceptual frameworks for improving STIP. This study built on the literature stream by unveiling the underlying structure of STIP expressed in the key areas and research fields explicitly supported for the case of Colombia 2005–2018 via co-word network analysis. We empirically identify the changing STIP priorities between two government administrations. While government-A prioritized Physical Sciences and Life Sciences and gave room for bi-disciplinary field communities, government-B doubled Health Sciences presence and balanced the participation of all areas. Social Sciences and Humanities had transversal participation in research field clusters. There were three fields with the highest weighted degree in both governments: renewable energy, sustainability, and the environment; general agricultural and biological sciences; and general medicine. This study provides a novel view based on well-established techniques to empirically study the structure of STIP and the effect of the government agenda for managing national science, technology, and innovation capacities by providing direction through research-oriented funding and proposal calls.
AB - STIP (science, technology, and innovation policy/es) affect how rules, methods and practices are designed and applied to develop basic or applied research within national borders. Literature on STIP has been fertile in multiple streams, such as theoretical/conceptual frameworks for improving STIP. This study built on the literature stream by unveiling the underlying structure of STIP expressed in the key areas and research fields explicitly supported for the case of Colombia 2005–2018 via co-word network analysis. We empirically identify the changing STIP priorities between two government administrations. While government-A prioritized Physical Sciences and Life Sciences and gave room for bi-disciplinary field communities, government-B doubled Health Sciences presence and balanced the participation of all areas. Social Sciences and Humanities had transversal participation in research field clusters. There were three fields with the highest weighted degree in both governments: renewable energy, sustainability, and the environment; general agricultural and biological sciences; and general medicine. This study provides a novel view based on well-established techniques to empirically study the structure of STIP and the effect of the government agenda for managing national science, technology, and innovation capacities by providing direction through research-oriented funding and proposal calls.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151057209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85151057209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_14
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_14
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85151057209
SN - 9783031280344
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 187
EP - 196
BT - Information for a Better World
A2 - Sserwanga, Isaac
A2 - Goulding, Anne
A2 - Moulaison-Sandy, Heather
A2 - Du, Jia Tina
A2 - Soares, António Lucas
A2 - Hessami, Viviane
A2 - Frank, Rebecca D.
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - 18th International Conference on Information for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity, iConference 2023
Y2 - 13 March 2023 through 17 March 2023
ER -
