Social Epistemology and Validation in Agent-Based Social Simulation

David Enrique Anzola Pinzon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


The literature in agent-based social simulation suggests that a model is validated when it is shown to ‘successfully’, ‘adequately’ or ‘satisfactorily’ represent the target phenomenon. The notion of ‘successful’, ‘adequate’ or ‘satisfactory’ representation, however, is both underspecified and difficult to generalise, in part, because practitioners use a multiplicity of criteria to judge representation, some of which are not entirely dependent on the testing of a computational model during validation processes. This article argues that practitioners should address social epistemology to achieve a deeper understanding of how warrants for belief in the adequacy of representation are produced. Two fundamental social processes for validation: interpretation and commensuration, are discussed to justify this claim. The analysis is advanced with a twofold aim. First, it shows that the conceptualisation of validation could greatly benefit from incorporating elements of social epistemology, for the criteria used to judge adequacy of representation are influenced by the social, cognitive and physical organisation of social simulation. Second, it evidences that standardisation tools such as protocols and frameworks fall short in accounting for key elements of social epistemology that affect different instances of validation processes.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number34
Pages (from-to)1-29
Number of pages30
Journal Philosophy & Technology
StatePublished - Aug 5 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'Social Epistemology and Validation in Agent-Based Social Simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this