Repensando la esquizofrenia a la luz de nuevas evidencias: treinta años después del estudio longitudinal de Vermont de personas con enfermedad mental grave: Rethinking schizophrenia in the light of new evidence: thirty years after the vermont longitudinal study of persons with severe mental illness

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite new evidence, procedures, client testimony, and movements around the world, old myths regarding schizophrenia still prevail among both the public and mental health professionals. Thirty years have passed since the mind-blowing publication in 1987 of the Vermont Longitudinal Study of Persons with Severe Mental Illness (Harding, Brooks, Ashikaga, Straus, & Breier), which led to Harding and Zahniser’s 1994 article, Empirical Correction of Seven Myths about Schizophrenia with Implications for Treatment. We need to systematically review what we know and what we do not know in the light of new evidence. We need to find ways to communicate the knowledge derived from academic research on schizophrenia and psychosis to professionals working with this population, and to people with schizophrenia and their families. Thus can we begin to break down the rock-solid prejudices that have been rooted in humanity for centuries.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-204
Number of pages6
JournalAvances en Psicologia Latinoamericana
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Repensando la esquizofrenia a la luz de nuevas evidencias: treinta años después del estudio longitudinal de Vermont de personas con enfermedad mental grave: Rethinking schizophrenia in the light of new evidence: thirty years after the vermont longitudinal study of persons with severe mental illness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this