On blame and reciprocity: Theory and experiments

Boğaçhan Çelen, Andrew Schotter, Mariana Blanco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2017 Elsevier Inc.The theory of reciprocity is predicated on the assumption that people are willing to reward kind acts and to punish unkind ones. This assumption raises the question of what kindness is. In this paper, we offer a novel definition of kindness based on a notion of blame. This notion states that for player j to judge whether or not player i is kind to him, player j has to put himself in the position of player i, and ask if he would act in a manner that is worse than what he believes player i does. If player j would act in a worse manner than player i, then we say that player j does not blame player i. If, however, player j would be nicer than player i, then we say that player j blames player i. We believe this notion is a natural, intuitive and empirically functional way to explain the motives of people engaging in reciprocal behavior. After developing the conceptual framework, we test this concept by using data from two laboratory experiments and find significant support for the theory.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-92
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Economic Theory
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Experiment
Laboratory experiments
Reward
Conceptual framework

Cite this

Çelen, Boğaçhan ; Schotter, Andrew ; Blanco, Mariana. / On blame and reciprocity: Theory and experiments. In: Journal of Economic Theory. 2017 ; pp. 62-92.
@article{9dfe348a3ffe444b84a962953f15b012,
title = "On blame and reciprocity: Theory and experiments",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2017 Elsevier Inc.The theory of reciprocity is predicated on the assumption that people are willing to reward kind acts and to punish unkind ones. This assumption raises the question of what kindness is. In this paper, we offer a novel definition of kindness based on a notion of blame. This notion states that for player j to judge whether or not player i is kind to him, player j has to put himself in the position of player i, and ask if he would act in a manner that is worse than what he believes player i does. If player j would act in a worse manner than player i, then we say that player j does not blame player i. If, however, player j would be nicer than player i, then we say that player j blames player i. We believe this notion is a natural, intuitive and empirically functional way to explain the motives of people engaging in reciprocal behavior. After developing the conceptual framework, we test this concept by using data from two laboratory experiments and find significant support for the theory.",
author = "Boğa{\cc}han {\cC}elen and Andrew Schotter and Mariana Blanco",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jet.2017.01.006",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "62--92",
journal = "Journal of Economic Theory",
issn = "0022-0531",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

On blame and reciprocity: Theory and experiments. / Çelen, Boğaçhan; Schotter, Andrew; Blanco, Mariana.

In: Journal of Economic Theory, 01.05.2017, p. 62-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On blame and reciprocity: Theory and experiments

AU - Çelen, Boğaçhan

AU - Schotter, Andrew

AU - Blanco, Mariana

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - © 2017 Elsevier Inc.The theory of reciprocity is predicated on the assumption that people are willing to reward kind acts and to punish unkind ones. This assumption raises the question of what kindness is. In this paper, we offer a novel definition of kindness based on a notion of blame. This notion states that for player j to judge whether or not player i is kind to him, player j has to put himself in the position of player i, and ask if he would act in a manner that is worse than what he believes player i does. If player j would act in a worse manner than player i, then we say that player j does not blame player i. If, however, player j would be nicer than player i, then we say that player j blames player i. We believe this notion is a natural, intuitive and empirically functional way to explain the motives of people engaging in reciprocal behavior. After developing the conceptual framework, we test this concept by using data from two laboratory experiments and find significant support for the theory.

AB - © 2017 Elsevier Inc.The theory of reciprocity is predicated on the assumption that people are willing to reward kind acts and to punish unkind ones. This assumption raises the question of what kindness is. In this paper, we offer a novel definition of kindness based on a notion of blame. This notion states that for player j to judge whether or not player i is kind to him, player j has to put himself in the position of player i, and ask if he would act in a manner that is worse than what he believes player i does. If player j would act in a worse manner than player i, then we say that player j does not blame player i. If, however, player j would be nicer than player i, then we say that player j blames player i. We believe this notion is a natural, intuitive and empirically functional way to explain the motives of people engaging in reciprocal behavior. After developing the conceptual framework, we test this concept by using data from two laboratory experiments and find significant support for the theory.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jet.2017.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jet.2017.01.006

M3 - Article

SP - 62

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Economic Theory

JF - Journal of Economic Theory

SN - 0022-0531

ER -