Neocolonialism and the Tension between International Investment Law and Indigenous Peoples: The Latin American Experience

Enrique Prieto-Ríos, Daniel Rivas-Ramírez

Research output: Chapter in Book/InformChapterResearch

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Chapter 4 looks at how Latin America has experienced both the negative effects of the international investment law system and tensions when trying to protect Indigenous peoples’ rights while simultaneously trying to attract foreign investment. Enrique Prieto-Ríos and Daniel Rivas-Ramírez present some prominent investment arbitration cases involving Latin American countries and the rights of Indigenous peoples. They conclude that Indigenous peoples in Latin America are invisible to investment arbitration tribunals because international investment arbitration is a self-contained system that does not look beyond international economic law to Indigenous rights or, more generally, human rights. Current negotiations among Canada, New Zealand and the Pacific Alliance offer an opportunity to consider including a chapter for Indigenous people. The addition of New Zealand and Canada as associate members means that they will have to address the rights of Indigenous peoples in some manner for domestic political reasons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationIndigenous Peoples and International Trade
Subtitle of host publicationBuilding equitable and inclusive international trade and investment agreements
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages85-108
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781108675321
ISBN (Print)9781108493062
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neocolonialism and the Tension between International Investment Law and Indigenous Peoples: The Latin American Experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this