TY - GEN
T1 - How to Improve Learning in Biomedical Engineering Students from an Integrated and Formative Evaluation
AU - Rodríguez Dueñas, William Ricardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Traditional evaluations of knowledge in engineering education usually focus on the assessments gathered by the teacher from different sources such as exams, essays and laboratory reports. However, this is a single actor’s point of view of a learning process: the teacher. The self-evaluation and feedback provided by classmates may also represent an important and useful contribution in at student’s learning process. This paper presents an integrated evaluation strategy that includes four equally important components: teacher evaluation, self-evaluation, peer evaluation and group work evaluation. A pilot study was carried out with 20 students taken the Biophysics 1 course offered by the Universidad del Rosario’s biomedical engineering program. Results reveal different performances within the groups, allowing the detection of cases where students showed difficulties. Furthermore, it demonstrates the importance of self-criticism and how to positively influence the learning process of others.
AB - Traditional evaluations of knowledge in engineering education usually focus on the assessments gathered by the teacher from different sources such as exams, essays and laboratory reports. However, this is a single actor’s point of view of a learning process: the teacher. The self-evaluation and feedback provided by classmates may also represent an important and useful contribution in at student’s learning process. This paper presents an integrated evaluation strategy that includes four equally important components: teacher evaluation, self-evaluation, peer evaluation and group work evaluation. A pilot study was carried out with 20 students taken the Biophysics 1 course offered by the Universidad del Rosario’s biomedical engineering program. Results reveal different performances within the groups, allowing the detection of cases where students showed difficulties. Furthermore, it demonstrates the importance of self-criticism and how to positively influence the learning process of others.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075667101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075667101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-30648-9_189
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-30648-9_189
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85075667101
SN - 9783030306472
T3 - IFMBE Proceedings
SP - 1472
EP - 1477
BT - 8th Latin American Conference on Biomedical Engineering and 42nd National Conference on Biomedical Engineering - Proceedings of CLAIB-CNIB 2019
A2 - González Díaz, César A.
A2 - Chapa González, Christian
A2 - Laciar Leber, Eric
A2 - Vélez, Hugo A.
A2 - Puente, Norma P.
A2 - Flores, Dora-Luz
A2 - Andrade, Adriano O.
A2 - Galván, Héctor A.
A2 - Martínez, Fabiola
A2 - García, Renato
A2 - Trujillo, Citlalli J.
A2 - Mejía, Aldo R.
PB - Springer
T2 - 8th Latin American Conference on Biomedical Engineering and the 42nd National Conference on Biomedical Engineering, CLAIB-CNIB 2019
Y2 - 2 October 2019 through 5 October 2019
ER -