TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence and Consensus-based Imaging Guidelines in Birdshot Chorioretinopathy
T2 - Multimodal Imaging in Uveitis (MUV) Taskforce Report 8
AU - PICHI, FRANCESCO
AU - MISEROCCHI, ELISABETTA
AU - GREWAL, DILRAJ S.
AU - SHARMA, SUMIT
AU - BRÉZIN, ANTOINE P.
AU - BODAGHI, BAHRAM
AU - AGARWAL, ANIRUDDHA
AU - JABS, DOUGLAS A.
AU - FAWZI, AMANI
AU - SARRAF, DAVID
AU - GUPTA, VISHALI
AU - de-la-Torre, Alejandra
AU - Fonollosa, Alejandro
AU - Invernizzi, Alessandro
AU - Fawzi, Amani
AU - Dick, Andrew
AU - Agarwal, Aniruddha
AU - Agarwal, Anita
AU - Brezin, Antoine
AU - Schlaen, Ariel
AU - Bodaghi, Bahram
AU - Fabiani, Claudia
AU - Sarraf, David
AU - Goldstein, Debra A.
AU - Grewal, Dilraj
AU - Tsui, Edmund
AU - Miserocchi, Elisabetta
AU - Carreño, Ester
AU - Pichi, Francesco
AU - Tugal-Tutkun, Ilknur
AU - Leal, Inês
AU - Davis, Janet L.
AU - Ossewaarde-van Norel, Jeanette
AU - Thorne, Jennifer E.
AU - Shantha, Jessica G.
AU - Pulido, Jose S.
AU - Smith, Justine
AU - Biswas, Jyotirmay
AU - Freund, K. Bailey
AU - Pepple, Kathryn
AU - Jampol, Lee M.
AU - Cimino, Luca
AU - De Smet, Marc
AU - Cicinelli, Maria Vittoria
AU - Munk, Marion R.
AU - Accorinti, Massimo
AU - Di Nicola, Maura
AU - Berkenstock, Meghan
AU - Altaweel, Michael
AU - Lin, Phoebe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Purpose: To develop consensus-based imaging guidelines for diagnosing and monitoring birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR). Design: Consensus-based approach guided by literature and an expert committee using a nominal group technique (NGT). Methods: An expert committee of 5 international uveitis specialists reviewed 15 well-documented representative BSCR cases with comprehensive imaging data. Cases with active and inactive disease were included. Imaging, including color fundus photography (CFP), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and OCT angiography (OCTA) were reviewed. Using a structured NGT approach, consensus-based recommendations were developed for specific disease characteristics, biomarkers of activity, and complications. The recommendations were voted upon by members of the full task force. Results: For the diagnosis of BSCR, CFP, FFA, and ICGA were identified as the key imaging modalities. ICGA was identified as a key imaging modality for assessing the presence of choroidal lesions. FFA was deemed crucial for monitoring retinal vascular leakage and assessing the treatment response. OCT, while not essential for diagnosis, was valuable for detecting complications such as cystoid macular edema and retinal thinning. The committee did not reach a consensus on the role of FAF and OCTA for the diagnosis or monitoring of BSCR. Conclusions: The MUV consensus-based imaging guidelines for BSCR expand the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) classification criteria by reaffirming the critical role of ICGA and providing a standardized guidelines for using other imaging modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of BSCR. These guidelines are expected to facilitate monitoring of disease activity and complications using multimodal imaging.
AB - Purpose: To develop consensus-based imaging guidelines for diagnosing and monitoring birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR). Design: Consensus-based approach guided by literature and an expert committee using a nominal group technique (NGT). Methods: An expert committee of 5 international uveitis specialists reviewed 15 well-documented representative BSCR cases with comprehensive imaging data. Cases with active and inactive disease were included. Imaging, including color fundus photography (CFP), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and OCT angiography (OCTA) were reviewed. Using a structured NGT approach, consensus-based recommendations were developed for specific disease characteristics, biomarkers of activity, and complications. The recommendations were voted upon by members of the full task force. Results: For the diagnosis of BSCR, CFP, FFA, and ICGA were identified as the key imaging modalities. ICGA was identified as a key imaging modality for assessing the presence of choroidal lesions. FFA was deemed crucial for monitoring retinal vascular leakage and assessing the treatment response. OCT, while not essential for diagnosis, was valuable for detecting complications such as cystoid macular edema and retinal thinning. The committee did not reach a consensus on the role of FAF and OCTA for the diagnosis or monitoring of BSCR. Conclusions: The MUV consensus-based imaging guidelines for BSCR expand the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) classification criteria by reaffirming the critical role of ICGA and providing a standardized guidelines for using other imaging modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of BSCR. These guidelines are expected to facilitate monitoring of disease activity and complications using multimodal imaging.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010902118
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105010902118&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.029
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.029
M3 - Research Article
C2 - 40545009
AN - SCOPUS:105010902118
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 278
SP - 271
EP - 281
JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology
ER -