Epilogo: Reflexiones sobre la irrelevancia del ser humano medio para la transculturalidad neoliberal de la ciudadanía global 

Translated title of the contribution: Epilogue: Reflections on the irrelevance of the average human being to the neoliberal transculturality of global citizenship 

Research output: Chapter in Book/ReportForeword/postscript

Abstract

The emphasis on the way in which the average human being experiences the different approaches to justice, which requires the elaboration of this last paradigm leaving aside: (i) the sociological categories of upper, middle and lower classes (largely formed by the States as shown, for example, by the case of Argentina, where according to its national statistics institute ('INDEC') all those who earn above the minimum wage would automatically become part of the middle class); and (ii) the economic concepts of poverty, extreme poverty and des-equality (which make the different analyses focus almost exclusively on that part of the population that is at the upper and lower ends of the income scale). This epilogue seeks to generate some questions about the lack of protagonism of the average citizen in the different areas of globalization.
Translated title of the contributionEpilogue: Reflections on the irrelevance of the average human being to the neoliberal transculturality of global citizenship 
Original languageSpanish
Title of host publication70 Aniversario de la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos: La Protección Universal de los Derechos Humanos en cuestión
EditorsCarol Proner, Héctor Olasolo, Carlos Villán Durán, Gisele Ricobom, Charlotth Back
PublisherTirant lo Blanch
Pages655-672
Number of pages17
Volume2
ISBN (Print)978-84-9190-026-9
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epilogue: Reflections on the irrelevance of the average human being to the neoliberal transculturality of global citizenship : Reflexiones sobre la irrelevancia del ser humano medio para la transculturalidad neoliberal de la ciudadanía global '. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this