Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efectividad de un programa de prevención en salud mental mediante el diálogo socrático y el pensamiento crítico

Translated title of the contribution: Effectiveness of a prevention program in mental health by socratic dialogue and critical thinking
  • Nora Londoño Arredondo
  • , Jorge Palacio Sañudo
  • , Carlos Acosta Barros
  • , Fernando Juárez Acosta
  • , Daniel Aguirre-Acevedo

    Research output: Contribution to Journal › Research Article › peer-review

    Abstract

    Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of the prevention program by Socratic dialogue and critical thinking, on depression and anxiety. Method: Participants were 110 students who entered their freshman year; an experimental design with experimental and control group was used. Independent variable was Socratic dialogue and critical thinking, and dependent variables were depression and/or anxiety symptoms, and negative, positives and anxious thoughts. Applied instruments consisted on Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Symptom Check List - 90 Revised (SCL-90R), Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire - Revised (ATQ-RP), and Anxious Self-Statements Scale (ASSQ). Results: By comparisons between the two groups, it was observed the effectiveness of the program in negative thought reduction, although no other effects were identified. Conclusions: Socratic dialogue and critical thinking can - like a prevention program, negative thoughts change in students at freshman year.

    Translated title of the contributionEffectiveness of a prevention program in mental health by socratic dialogue and critical thinking
    Original languageSpanish
    Pages (from-to)11-24
    Number of pages14
    JournalSalud Uninorte
    Volume32
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of a prevention program in mental health by socratic dialogue and critical thinking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this