Differentiation Theory and the Global South as a Metageography of International Relations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article, I argue that while the Global South has replaced the Third World as the prevalent term for describing structural global inequalities in International Relations, little research is directed at its theoretical implications. I discuss the conceptual evolution of the term from the Third World narrative, interpreting the literature as an implicit rejection of myopic ontologies relying on economic,
cultural, or political hierarchies. I then suggest connecting the terminology to the theory of functional differentiation. By avoiding forms inherited from classical social theory, the Global South can be conceptualized in a more productive way that is better attuned to contemporary theoretical discussions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-80
Number of pages21
JournalAlternatives
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018

Cite this

@article{63360a0637f7460ba6517efbc85538ef,
title = "Differentiation Theory and the Global South as a Metageography of International Relations",
abstract = "In this article, I argue that while the Global South has replaced the Third World as the prevalent term for describing structural global inequalities in International Relations, little research is directed at its theoretical implications. I discuss the conceptual evolution of the term from the Third World narrative, interpreting the literature as an implicit rejection of myopic ontologies relying on economic,cultural, or political hierarchies. I then suggest connecting the terminology to the theory of functional differentiation. By avoiding forms inherited from classical social theory, the Global South can be conceptualized in a more productive way that is better attuned to contemporary theoretical discussions.",
author = "Jochen Kleinschmidt",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "DOI: 10.1177/0304375418811191",
language = "Ingl{\'e}s",
volume = "43",
pages = "59--80",
journal = "Alternatives",
issn = "0304-3754",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Differentiation Theory and the Global South as a Metageography of International Relations. / Kleinschmidt, Jochen.

In: Alternatives, Vol. 43, No. 2, 11.2018, p. 59-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differentiation Theory and the Global South as a Metageography of International Relations

AU - Kleinschmidt, Jochen

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - In this article, I argue that while the Global South has replaced the Third World as the prevalent term for describing structural global inequalities in International Relations, little research is directed at its theoretical implications. I discuss the conceptual evolution of the term from the Third World narrative, interpreting the literature as an implicit rejection of myopic ontologies relying on economic,cultural, or political hierarchies. I then suggest connecting the terminology to the theory of functional differentiation. By avoiding forms inherited from classical social theory, the Global South can be conceptualized in a more productive way that is better attuned to contemporary theoretical discussions.

AB - In this article, I argue that while the Global South has replaced the Third World as the prevalent term for describing structural global inequalities in International Relations, little research is directed at its theoretical implications. I discuss the conceptual evolution of the term from the Third World narrative, interpreting the literature as an implicit rejection of myopic ontologies relying on economic,cultural, or political hierarchies. I then suggest connecting the terminology to the theory of functional differentiation. By avoiding forms inherited from classical social theory, the Global South can be conceptualized in a more productive way that is better attuned to contemporary theoretical discussions.

U2 - DOI: 10.1177/0304375418811191

DO - DOI: 10.1177/0304375418811191

M3 - Artículo

VL - 43

SP - 59

EP - 80

JO - Alternatives

JF - Alternatives

SN - 0304-3754

IS - 2

ER -