Abstract
This book explores the process of constructing the concept of “jungle yellow fever” and the role that Colombian researchers played in its discovery. It is aimed at the general public and academics in the health and human sciences interested in history, and in the history of medicine, public health and the sciences, in particular, as well as public policy makers and decision makers in health. Drawing on historical epistemology, sociology of knowledge and political sociology, the book presents the conceptual and technical controversies in the field of yellow fever from the late 19th century in Colombia until the consolidation of the concept of sylvatic yellow fever in the 1930s. It explores how the Rockefeller Foundation ignored the analyses of national physicians who hypothesized the presence of rural yellow fever and, supported by its economic, political and scientific power, took priority in the discovery of the concept, showing the complexity of the actions of the sociopolitical actors involved, as well as the asymmetries of power that explain the control of symbolic capital on the part of North American researchers over the field of yellow fever, over peripheral actors.
| Original language | Spanish (Colombia) |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Bogotá |
| Publisher | Universidad del Rosario |
| Number of pages | 311 |
| Edition | Primera edición |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9789587389029 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789587389012 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
- General Medicine
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver