CONTROVERSIAS CIENTÍFICAS Y TRADICIÓN FILOSÓFICA

Carlos Alberto Cardona

doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90691

CONTROVERSIAS CIENTÍFICAS Y TRADICIÓN FILOSÓFICA

Translated title of the contribution: SCIENTIFIC CONTROVERSIES AND PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION

Carlos Alberto Cardona

School of Human Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Research Article › peer-review

Abstract

The article discusses the following question: why has the traditional philosophy of science been reluctant to seriously deal with scientific controversies? An answer is offered and an alternative is suggested. This alternative gives a leading role to the study of controversies within the framework of the philosophy of science. This proposal is supported, firstly, by a brief review of the research methodology employed by Johannes Kepler and, secondly, by the study of the emergence of quantum mechanics by Mara Beller. The defense of the study of controversies is based on the recognition of the other one as the founding point of scientific objectivity and in the proposal of a kind of triangulation.

Translated title of the contribution	SCIENTIFIC CONTROVERSIES AND PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	397-424
Number of pages	28
Journal	Principia
Volume	27
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90691
State	Published - 2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Philosophy
History and Philosophy of Science

Access to Document

10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90691

Cite this

@article{7cd86c9698124517860d392c3c3c8b8e,

title = "CONTROVERSIAS CIENT{\'I}FICAS Y TRADICI{\'O}N FILOS{\'O}FICA",

abstract = "The article discusses the following question: why has the traditional philosophy of science been reluctant to seriously deal with scientific controversies? An answer is offered and an alternative is suggested. This alternative gives a leading role to the study of controversies within the framework of the philosophy of science. This proposal is supported, firstly, by a brief review of the research methodology employed by Johannes Kepler and, secondly, by the study of the emergence of quantum mechanics by Mara Beller. The defense of the study of controversies is based on the recognition of the other one as the founding point of scientific objectivity and in the proposal of a kind of triangulation.",

author = "{Alberto Cardona}, Carlos",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The author(s).",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90691",

language = "Espa{\~n}ol",

volume = "27",

pages = "397--424",

journal = "Principia",

issn = "1414-4247",

publisher = "Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CONTROVERSIAS CIENTÍFICAS Y TRADICIÓN FILOSÓFICA

AU - Alberto Cardona, Carlos

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The article discusses the following question: why has the traditional philosophy of science been reluctant to seriously deal with scientific controversies? An answer is offered and an alternative is suggested. This alternative gives a leading role to the study of controversies within the framework of the philosophy of science. This proposal is supported, firstly, by a brief review of the research methodology employed by Johannes Kepler and, secondly, by the study of the emergence of quantum mechanics by Mara Beller. The defense of the study of controversies is based on the recognition of the other one as the founding point of scientific objectivity and in the proposal of a kind of triangulation.

AB - The article discusses the following question: why has the traditional philosophy of science been reluctant to seriously deal with scientific controversies? An answer is offered and an alternative is suggested. This alternative gives a leading role to the study of controversies within the framework of the philosophy of science. This proposal is supported, firstly, by a brief review of the research methodology employed by Johannes Kepler and, secondly, by the study of the emergence of quantum mechanics by Mara Beller. The defense of the study of controversies is based on the recognition of the other one as the founding point of scientific objectivity and in the proposal of a kind of triangulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181257822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85181257822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90691

DO - 10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90691

M3 - Artículo de Investigación

AN - SCOPUS:85181257822

SN - 1414-4247

VL - 27

SP - 397

EP - 424

JO - Principia

JF - Principia

IS - 3

ER -

CONTROVERSIAS CIENTÍFICAS Y TRADICIÓN FILOSÓFICA

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this