Common sense and conflict: Impact of lay theories on intergroup relationships

Luisa Ramírez, Shery Levy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Lay theories are theories that lay people use to understand and predict events in their everyday life. Empirical evidence suggests that lay theories impact intergroup relations, among other things, because of their ability to promote tolerance or rejection towards social minorities. This review focuses on research findings on the relationship between three lay theories (Protestant Work Ethic, Just World Belief and Psychological Essentialism), and attitudes toward minority groups across several social and cultural contexts, while addressing the role of other variables that may have an impact on their interpretation (perceiver and contextual characteristics). In doing so, it attempts to establish the relevance of the study of lay theories in the Latin-American context emphasizing the findings of the scarce, yet substantial, work performed so far, as well as the need to perform more research in this direction.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-344
Number of pages14
JournalUniversitas Psychologica
StatePublished - May 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Common sense and conflict: Impact of lay theories on intergroup relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this