Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review

Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Cristian Álvarez, Antonio García-Hermoso, Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, Paulo Gentil, Abbas Asadi, Helmi Chaabene, Jason Moran, Cesar Meylan, Antonio García-de-Alcaraz, Javier Sanchez-Sanchez, Fabio Y. Nakamura, Urs Granacher, William Kraemer, Mikel Izquierdo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently, there has been a proliferation of published articles on the effect of plyometric jump training, including several review articles and meta-analyses. However, these types of research articles are generally of narrow scope. Furthermore, methodological limitations among studies (e.g., a lack of active/passive control groups) prevent the generalization of results, and these factors need to be addressed by researchers. On that basis, the aims of this scoping review were to (1) characterize the main elements of plyometric jump training studies (e.g., training protocols) and (2) provide future directions for research. From 648 potentially relevant articles, 242 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified related to an insufficient number of studies conducted in females, youths, and individual sports (~ 24.0, ~ 37.0, and ~ 12.0% of overall studies, respectively); insufficient reporting of effect size values and training prescription (~ 34.0 and ~ 55.0% of overall studies, respectively); and studies missing an active/passive control group and randomization (~ 40.0 and ~ 20.0% of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, plyometric jump training was often combined with other training methods and added to participants’ daily training routines (~ 47.0 and ~ 39.0% of overall studies, respectively), thus distorting conclusions on its independent effects. Additionally, most studies lasted no longer than 7 weeks. In future, researchers are advised to conduct plyometric training studies of high methodological quality (e.g., randomized controlled trials). More research is needed in females, youth, and individual sports. Finally, the identification of specific dose-response relationships following plyometric training is needed to specifically tailor intervention programs, particularly in the long term.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1059-1081
Number of pages23
JournalSports Medicine
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Ramirez-Campillo, R., Álvarez, C., García-Hermoso, A., Ramírez-Vélez, R., Gentil, P., Asadi, A., ... Izquierdo, M. (2018). Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review. Sports Medicine, 48(5), 1059-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z
Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo ; Álvarez, Cristian ; García-Hermoso, Antonio ; Ramírez-Vélez, Robinson ; Gentil, Paulo ; Asadi, Abbas ; Chaabene, Helmi ; Moran, Jason ; Meylan, Cesar ; García-de-Alcaraz, Antonio ; Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier ; Nakamura, Fabio Y. ; Granacher, Urs ; Kraemer, William ; Izquierdo, Mikel. / Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research : A Scoping Review. In: Sports Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 48, No. 5. pp. 1059-1081.
@article{89dbe30b06044042b981e93a3a22c354,
title = "Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review",
abstract = "Recently, there has been a proliferation of published articles on the effect of plyometric jump training, including several review articles and meta-analyses. However, these types of research articles are generally of narrow scope. Furthermore, methodological limitations among studies (e.g., a lack of active/passive control groups) prevent the generalization of results, and these factors need to be addressed by researchers. On that basis, the aims of this scoping review were to (1) characterize the main elements of plyometric jump training studies (e.g., training protocols) and (2) provide future directions for research. From 648 potentially relevant articles, 242 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified related to an insufficient number of studies conducted in females, youths, and individual sports (~ 24.0, ~ 37.0, and ~ 12.0{\%} of overall studies, respectively); insufficient reporting of effect size values and training prescription (~ 34.0 and ~ 55.0{\%} of overall studies, respectively); and studies missing an active/passive control group and randomization (~ 40.0 and ~ 20.0{\%} of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, plyometric jump training was often combined with other training methods and added to participants’ daily training routines (~ 47.0 and ~ 39.0{\%} of overall studies, respectively), thus distorting conclusions on its independent effects. Additionally, most studies lasted no longer than 7 weeks. In future, researchers are advised to conduct plyometric training studies of high methodological quality (e.g., randomized controlled trials). More research is needed in females, youth, and individual sports. Finally, the identification of specific dose-response relationships following plyometric training is needed to specifically tailor intervention programs, particularly in the long term.",
author = "Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo and Cristian {\'A}lvarez and Antonio Garc{\'i}a-Hermoso and Robinson Ram{\'i}rez-V{\'e}lez and Paulo Gentil and Abbas Asadi and Helmi Chaabene and Jason Moran and Cesar Meylan and Antonio Garc{\'i}a-de-Alcaraz and Javier Sanchez-Sanchez and Nakamura, {Fabio Y.} and Urs Granacher and William Kraemer and Mikel Izquierdo",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "1059--1081",
journal = "Sports Medicine",
issn = "0112-1642",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "5",

}

Ramirez-Campillo, R, Álvarez, C, García-Hermoso, A, Ramírez-Vélez, R, Gentil, P, Asadi, A, Chaabene, H, Moran, J, Meylan, C, García-de-Alcaraz, A, Sanchez-Sanchez, J, Nakamura, FY, Granacher, U, Kraemer, W & Izquierdo, M 2018, 'Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review', Sports Medicine, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1059-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z

Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research : A Scoping Review. / Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo; Álvarez, Cristian; García-Hermoso, Antonio; Ramírez-Vélez, Robinson; Gentil, Paulo; Asadi, Abbas; Chaabene, Helmi; Moran, Jason; Meylan, Cesar; García-de-Alcaraz, Antonio; Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier; Nakamura, Fabio Y.; Granacher, Urs; Kraemer, William; Izquierdo, Mikel.

In: Sports Medicine, Vol. 48, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 1059-1081.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research

T2 - A Scoping Review

AU - Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo

AU - Álvarez, Cristian

AU - García-Hermoso, Antonio

AU - Ramírez-Vélez, Robinson

AU - Gentil, Paulo

AU - Asadi, Abbas

AU - Chaabene, Helmi

AU - Moran, Jason

AU - Meylan, Cesar

AU - García-de-Alcaraz, Antonio

AU - Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier

AU - Nakamura, Fabio Y.

AU - Granacher, Urs

AU - Kraemer, William

AU - Izquierdo, Mikel

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Recently, there has been a proliferation of published articles on the effect of plyometric jump training, including several review articles and meta-analyses. However, these types of research articles are generally of narrow scope. Furthermore, methodological limitations among studies (e.g., a lack of active/passive control groups) prevent the generalization of results, and these factors need to be addressed by researchers. On that basis, the aims of this scoping review were to (1) characterize the main elements of plyometric jump training studies (e.g., training protocols) and (2) provide future directions for research. From 648 potentially relevant articles, 242 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified related to an insufficient number of studies conducted in females, youths, and individual sports (~ 24.0, ~ 37.0, and ~ 12.0% of overall studies, respectively); insufficient reporting of effect size values and training prescription (~ 34.0 and ~ 55.0% of overall studies, respectively); and studies missing an active/passive control group and randomization (~ 40.0 and ~ 20.0% of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, plyometric jump training was often combined with other training methods and added to participants’ daily training routines (~ 47.0 and ~ 39.0% of overall studies, respectively), thus distorting conclusions on its independent effects. Additionally, most studies lasted no longer than 7 weeks. In future, researchers are advised to conduct plyometric training studies of high methodological quality (e.g., randomized controlled trials). More research is needed in females, youth, and individual sports. Finally, the identification of specific dose-response relationships following plyometric training is needed to specifically tailor intervention programs, particularly in the long term.

AB - Recently, there has been a proliferation of published articles on the effect of plyometric jump training, including several review articles and meta-analyses. However, these types of research articles are generally of narrow scope. Furthermore, methodological limitations among studies (e.g., a lack of active/passive control groups) prevent the generalization of results, and these factors need to be addressed by researchers. On that basis, the aims of this scoping review were to (1) characterize the main elements of plyometric jump training studies (e.g., training protocols) and (2) provide future directions for research. From 648 potentially relevant articles, 242 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified related to an insufficient number of studies conducted in females, youths, and individual sports (~ 24.0, ~ 37.0, and ~ 12.0% of overall studies, respectively); insufficient reporting of effect size values and training prescription (~ 34.0 and ~ 55.0% of overall studies, respectively); and studies missing an active/passive control group and randomization (~ 40.0 and ~ 20.0% of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, plyometric jump training was often combined with other training methods and added to participants’ daily training routines (~ 47.0 and ~ 39.0% of overall studies, respectively), thus distorting conclusions on its independent effects. Additionally, most studies lasted no longer than 7 weeks. In future, researchers are advised to conduct plyometric training studies of high methodological quality (e.g., randomized controlled trials). More research is needed in females, youth, and individual sports. Finally, the identification of specific dose-response relationships following plyometric training is needed to specifically tailor intervention programs, particularly in the long term.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042390538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042390538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z

DO - 10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29470823

AN - SCOPUS:85042390538

VL - 48

SP - 1059

EP - 1081

JO - Sports Medicine

JF - Sports Medicine

SN - 0112-1642

IS - 5

ER -

Ramirez-Campillo R, Álvarez C, García-Hermoso A, Ramírez-Vélez R, Gentil P, Asadi A et al. Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review. Sports Medicine. 2018 May 1;48(5):1059-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z