TY - JOUR
T1 - Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth
AU - Otero, Iago
AU - Farrell, Katharine N.
AU - Pueyo, Salvador
AU - Kallis, Giorgos
AU - Kehoe, Laura
AU - Haberl, Helmut
AU - Plutzar, Christoph
AU - Hobson, Peter
AU - García-Márquez, Jaime
AU - Rodríguez-Labajos, Beatriz
AU - Martin, Jean Louis
AU - Erb, Karl Heinz
AU - Schindler, Stefan
AU - Nielsen, Jonas
AU - Skorin, Teuta
AU - Settele, Josef
AU - Essl, Franz
AU - Gómez-Baggethun, Erik
AU - Brotons, Lluís
AU - Rabitsch, Wolfgang
AU - Schneider, François
AU - Pe'er, Guy
PY - 2020/4/15
Y1 - 2020/4/15
N2 - Increasing evidence—synthesized in this paper—shows that economic growth contributes to biodiversity loss via greater resource consumption and higher emissions. Nonetheless, a review of international biodiversity and sustainability policies shows that the majority advocate economic growth. Since improvements in resource use efficiency have so far not allowed for absolute global reductions in resource use and pollution, we question the support for economic growth in these policies, where inadequate attention is paid to the question of how growth can be decoupled from biodiversity loss. Drawing on the literature about alternatives to economic growth, we explore this contradiction and suggest ways forward to halt global biodiversity decline. These include policy proposals to move beyond the growth paradigm while enhancing overall prosperity, which can be implemented by combining top-down and bottom-up governance across scales. Finally, we call the attention of researchers and policy makers to two immediate steps: acknowledge the conflict between economic growth and biodiversity conservation in future policies; and explore socioeconomic trajectories beyond economic growth in the next generation of biodiversity scenarios.
AB - Increasing evidence—synthesized in this paper—shows that economic growth contributes to biodiversity loss via greater resource consumption and higher emissions. Nonetheless, a review of international biodiversity and sustainability policies shows that the majority advocate economic growth. Since improvements in resource use efficiency have so far not allowed for absolute global reductions in resource use and pollution, we question the support for economic growth in these policies, where inadequate attention is paid to the question of how growth can be decoupled from biodiversity loss. Drawing on the literature about alternatives to economic growth, we explore this contradiction and suggest ways forward to halt global biodiversity decline. These include policy proposals to move beyond the growth paradigm while enhancing overall prosperity, which can be implemented by combining top-down and bottom-up governance across scales. Finally, we call the attention of researchers and policy makers to two immediate steps: acknowledge the conflict between economic growth and biodiversity conservation in future policies; and explore socioeconomic trajectories beyond economic growth in the next generation of biodiversity scenarios.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083326093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083326093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/conl.12713
DO - 10.1111/conl.12713
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32999687
AN - SCOPUS:85083326093
SN - 1755-263X
VL - 13
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - Conservation Letters
JF - Conservation Letters
IS - 4
M1 - e12713
ER -