TY - JOUR
T1 - Antibiofilm activity of manogepix, ibrexafungerp, amphotericin B, rezafungin, and caspofungin against Candida spp. biofilms of reference and clinical strains
AU - Ceballos-Garzon, Andres
AU - Lebrat, Julien
AU - Holzapfel, Marion
AU - Josa, Diego F.
AU - Welsch, Jeremy
AU - Mercer, Derry
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Ceballos-Garzon et al.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - This study comprehensively assessed the activity of manogepix (MNGX), ibrexafungerp (IBF), amphotericin B (AMB), rezafungin (RZF), and caspofungin (CAS) against planktonic cells and mature biofilms of Candida spp.—reference and clinical strains using the Calgary biofilm device. Mature-phase biofilms of C. albicans, C. auris (clades I, II, III, IV), and C. parapsilosis were exposed to a range of drug concentrations (0.12–128 µg/mL). Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values for planktonic cells were ≤2 µg/mL for all strains; however, biofilm-associated MICs, minimum biocidal concentration (MBC), minimum biofilm eradication (MBEC), and minimum biofilm damaging concentration (MBDC) were significantly higher (2–4,119 times). Geometric mean (GM) of MBEC values indicated that MNGX had the highest antifungal activity within Candida species, with a GM-MBEC of 5.9 µg/mL. Despite its overall potency, MNGX was less effective against C. auris biofilms from clade IV strains, where IBF showed superior activity. While not the most potent agent overall, AMB induced the smallest fold-change increases (2- to 32-fold) in biofilm-associated states data compared to planktonic MICs. Conversely, CAS exhibited the lowest activity against Candida spp. biofilms. The eradication of C. auris and C. parapsilosis biofilms required substantially higher concentrations than C. albicans, with some agents, such as RZF and CAS, necessitating up to 42-fold increases in dosage. In conclusion, our in vitro model highlights the antibiofilm activity of novel antifungals against major Candida species, revealing significant differences in efficacy among species. MNGX demonstrated the highest activity, underscoring its potential as a promising candidate for the treatment of biofilm-related infections.
AB - This study comprehensively assessed the activity of manogepix (MNGX), ibrexafungerp (IBF), amphotericin B (AMB), rezafungin (RZF), and caspofungin (CAS) against planktonic cells and mature biofilms of Candida spp.—reference and clinical strains using the Calgary biofilm device. Mature-phase biofilms of C. albicans, C. auris (clades I, II, III, IV), and C. parapsilosis were exposed to a range of drug concentrations (0.12–128 µg/mL). Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values for planktonic cells were ≤2 µg/mL for all strains; however, biofilm-associated MICs, minimum biocidal concentration (MBC), minimum biofilm eradication (MBEC), and minimum biofilm damaging concentration (MBDC) were significantly higher (2–4,119 times). Geometric mean (GM) of MBEC values indicated that MNGX had the highest antifungal activity within Candida species, with a GM-MBEC of 5.9 µg/mL. Despite its overall potency, MNGX was less effective against C. auris biofilms from clade IV strains, where IBF showed superior activity. While not the most potent agent overall, AMB induced the smallest fold-change increases (2- to 32-fold) in biofilm-associated states data compared to planktonic MICs. Conversely, CAS exhibited the lowest activity against Candida spp. biofilms. The eradication of C. auris and C. parapsilosis biofilms required substantially higher concentrations than C. albicans, with some agents, such as RZF and CAS, necessitating up to 42-fold increases in dosage. In conclusion, our in vitro model highlights the antibiofilm activity of novel antifungals against major Candida species, revealing significant differences in efficacy among species. MNGX demonstrated the highest activity, underscoring its potential as a promising candidate for the treatment of biofilm-related infections.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105007298815&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105007298815&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/aac.00137-25
DO - 10.1128/aac.00137-25
M3 - Research Article
C2 - 40372013
AN - SCOPUS:105007298815
SN - 0066-4804
VL - 69
JO - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
JF - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
IS - 6
ER -