Abstract
Constitutional courts, like in de pen dent central banks, were seen by the in-ternational financial institutions and aid agencies fueling judicial reform in Latin Amer i ca in the late 1980s and early 1990s as crucial to neoliberal eco-nomic development. Safe from the vicissitudes of representative democracy by virtue of their design, high courts were deemed ideally located to pro-vide much-needed guarantees of legal predictability. Strengthening courts and the judicial system in general was seen as vital to promoting legal sta-bility, providing access to justice for investors, increasing effectiveness, and safeguarding the neoliberal model (Carothers 2001; Rodríguez Garavito 2011). In this context, wide-ranging reforms often provided for the cre-ation of constitutional tribunals where none existed or for the empowerment of those already existing.Some of these new or recen
| Translated title of the contribution | ¿Agentes del neoliberalismo? Altos tribunales, preferencias legales y derechos en América Latina |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Title of host publication | Latin America Since the Left Turn |
| Editors | Tulia G. Falleti , Emilio A. Parrado |
| Place of Publication | Estados Unidos |
| Publisher | University of Pennsylvania |
| Chapter | Chapter 10 |
| Pages | 214-240 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780812249712 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Agents of neoliberalism? High Courts, Legal preferences and Rights in Latin America'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver