A note on testing for spatial error components

Fernando Carriazo; Edward Coulson

doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.08.001

A note on testing for spatial error components

Fernando Carriazo, Edward Coulson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Research Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The two tests for spatial error components are the Kelejian-Robinson (KR) test and the LM test developed by Anselin (2001). We develop a new form for the LM test which facilitates comparisons to the KR test, and show why the LM test is superior. We develop a second test in the spirit of KR which overcomes this particular shortcoming, but in fact incurs a second shortcoming which renders it inferior even to the original KR test. We discuss this failure as well.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	331-335
Number of pages	5
Journal	Regional Science and Urban Economics
Volume	40
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.08.001
State	Published - Sep 2010
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Economics and Econometrics
Urban Studies

Access to Document

10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.08.001

Cite this

@article{79c90ca8fbf24a27b143432515c59054,

title = "A note on testing for spatial error components",

abstract = "The two tests for spatial error components are the Kelejian-Robinson (KR) test and the LM test developed by Anselin (2001). We develop a new form for the LM test which facilitates comparisons to the KR test, and show why the LM test is superior. We develop a second test in the spirit of KR which overcomes this particular shortcoming, but in fact incurs a second shortcoming which renders it inferior even to the original KR test. We discuss this failure as well.",

author = "Fernando Carriazo and Edward Coulson",

year = "2010",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.08.001",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "40",

pages = "331--335",

journal = "Regional Science and Urban Economics",

issn = "0166-0462",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A note on testing for spatial error components

AU - Carriazo, Fernando

AU - Coulson, Edward

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - The two tests for spatial error components are the Kelejian-Robinson (KR) test and the LM test developed by Anselin (2001). We develop a new form for the LM test which facilitates comparisons to the KR test, and show why the LM test is superior. We develop a second test in the spirit of KR which overcomes this particular shortcoming, but in fact incurs a second shortcoming which renders it inferior even to the original KR test. We discuss this failure as well.

AB - The two tests for spatial error components are the Kelejian-Robinson (KR) test and the LM test developed by Anselin (2001). We develop a new form for the LM test which facilitates comparisons to the KR test, and show why the LM test is superior. We develop a second test in the spirit of KR which overcomes this particular shortcoming, but in fact incurs a second shortcoming which renders it inferior even to the original KR test. We discuss this failure as well.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77955420168

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955420168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.08.001

M3 - Research Article

AN - SCOPUS:77955420168

SN - 0166-0462

VL - 40

SP - 331

EP - 335

JO - Regional Science and Urban Economics

JF - Regional Science and Urban Economics

IS - 5

ER -

A note on testing for spatial error components

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this