TY - JOUR
T1 - A new bayesian method for fitting evolutionary models to comparative data with intraspecific variation
AU - Revell, L.J.
AU - Graham Reynolds, R.
N1 - Cited By :36
Export Date: 17 April 2018
CODEN: EVOLA
Correspondence Address: Revell, L.J.; Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, United States; email: [email protected]
References: Ando, T., Bayesian predictive information criterion for the evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian and empirical Bayes models (2007) Biometrika, 94, pp. 443-458; Blomberg, S.P., Garland Jr, T., Ives, A.R., Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile (2003) Evolution, 57, pp. 717-745; Bokma, F., Detection of punctuated equilibrium from molecular phylogenies (2002) J. Evol. Biol., 15, pp. 1048-1056; Detection of "punctuated equilibrium" by Bayesian estimation of speciation and extinction rates, ancestral character states, and rates of anagenetic and cladogenetic evolution on a molecular phylogeny (2008) Evolution, 62, pp. 2718-2726; Bürger, R., Wagner, G.P., Stettinger, F., How much heritable variation can be maintained in a finite population by mutation-selection balance (1989) Evolution, 43, pp. 1748-1766; Butler, M.A., King, A.A., Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution (2004) Am. Nat., 164, pp. 683-695; Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Edwards, A.W.F., Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures (1967) Am. J. Hum. Genet., 19, pp. 233-257; Eastman, J.M., Alfaro, M.E., Joyce, P., Hipp, A.L., Harmon, L.J., A novel comparative method for identifying shifts in the rate of character evolution on trees (2011) Evolution, 65, pp. 3578-3589; Falconer, D.S., Mackay, T.F.C., (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, , Prentice Hall, Essex, U.K; Felsenstein, J., Phylogenies and the comparative method (1985) Am. Nat., 125, pp. 1-15; Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised (2008) Am. Nat., 171, pp. 713-725; Harmon, L.J., Losos, J.B., The effect of intraspecific sample size on type I and type II error rates in comparative studies (2005) Evolution, 59, pp. 2705-2710; Harmon, L.J., Weir, J.T., Brock, C.D., Glor, R.E., Challenger, W., GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations (2008) Bioinformatics, 24, pp. 129-131; Heidelberger, P., Welch, P.D., Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient (1983) Oper. Res., 31, pp. 1109-1144; Huelsenbeck, J.P., Bollback, J.P., Empirical and hierarchical Bayesian estimation of ancestral states (2001) Syst. Biol., 50, pp. 351-366; Hulsey, C.D., Hollingsworth Jr, P.J., Do constructional constraints influence cyprinid (Cyprinidae: Leuciscinae) craniofacial coevolution? (2011) Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 103, pp. 136-146; Ives, A.R., Midford, P.E., Garland Jr, T., Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods (2007) Syst. Biol., 56, pp. 252-270; Johnson, W.E., Eizirik, E., Pecon-Slattery, J., Murphy, W.J., Antunes, A., Teeling, E., O'Brien, S.J., The late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: a genetic assessment (2006) Science, 311, pp. 73-77; Jones, A.G., Arnold, S.J., Bürger, R., Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift (2003) Evolution, 57, pp. 1747-1760; Lynch, M., Walsh, B., (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits, , Sinauer, Sunderland, MA; (2011) MATLAB 7.13 R2011b, , MathWorks. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA; Meachen-Samuels, J., Van Valkenburgh, B., Craniodental indicators of prey size preference in the Felidae (2009) Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 96, pp. 784-799; Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H., Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines (1953) J. Chem. Phys., 21, pp. 1087-1092; O'Meara, B.C., Ané, C., Sanderson, M.J., Wainwright, P.C., Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood (2006) Evolution, 60, pp. 922-933; Pagel, M., Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution (1999) Nature, 401, pp. 877-884; Paradis, E., Claude, J., Strimmer, K., APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language (2004) Bioinformatics, 20, pp. 289-290; Plummer, M., Best, N., Cowles, K., Vines, K., CODA: convergence diagnostics and output analysis for MCMC (2006) R. News, 6, pp. 7-11; Posada, D., ModelTest Server: A web-based tool for the statistical selection of models of nucleotide substitution online (2006) Nucleic Acids Research, 34, pp. W700-W703; Price, T., Correlated evolution and independent contrasts (1997) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 352, pp. 519-529; R: a language and environment for statistical computing (2011) R foundation for statistical computing, , R Development Core Team. ., Vienna, Austria; Revell, L.J., Testing the genetic constraint hypothesis in a phylogenetic context: a simulation study (2007) Evolution, 61, pp. 2720-2727; On the analysis of evolutionary change along single branches in a phylogeny (2008) Am. Nat., 172, pp. 140-147; Phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things) (2012) Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, pp. 217-223; Revell, L.J., Collar, D.C., Phylogenetic analysis of the evolutionary correlation using likelihood (2009) Evolution, 63, pp. 1090-1100; Revell, L.J., Harmon, L.J., Collar, D.C., Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate (2008) Syst. Biol., 57, pp. 591-601; Revell, L.J., Mahler, D.L., Peres-Neto, P.R., Redelings, B.D., A new phylogenetic method for identifying exceptional phenotypic diversification (2012) Evolution, 66, pp. 135-146; Rohlf, F.J., Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations (2001) Evolution, 55, pp. 2143-2160; Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P., MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models (2003) Bioinformatics, 19, pp. 1572-1574; Sanderson, M.J., Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach (2002) Mol. Biol. Evol., 19, pp. 101-109; Slater, G.J., Harmon, L.J., Wegmann, D., Joyce, P., Revell, L.J., Alfaro, M.E., Fitting models of continuous trait evolution to incompletely sampled comparative data using Approximate Bayesian Computation (2012) Evolution, 66, pp. 752-762; Spielgelhalter, D.J., Best, N.G., Carlin, B.P., van der Linde, A., Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (2002) J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 64, pp. 583-639; Thomas, G.H., Freckleton, R.P., MOTMOT: models of trait macroevolution on trees (2012) Methods Ecol. Evol., 3, pp. 145-151; Thomas, G.H., Freckleton, R.P., Székely, T., Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds (2006) Proc. R. Soc. B, 273, pp. 1619-1624; Van Valkenburgh, B., Koepfli, K.P., Cranial and dental adaptations to predation in Canids (1993) Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond., 65, pp. 15-37; Yang, Z., (2006) Computational molecular evolution, , Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K; Yang, Z., Rannala, B., Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain Monte Carlo method (1997) Mol. Biol. Evol., 14, pp. 717-724
PY - 2012/3/12
Y1 - 2012/3/12
N2 - Phylogenetic comparative methods that incorporate intraspecific variability are relatively new and, so far, not especially widely used in empirical studies. In the present short article we will describe a new Bayesian method for fitting evolutionary models to comparative data that incorporates intraspecific variability. This method differs from an existing likelihood-based approach in that it requires no a priori inference about species means and variances; rather it takes phenotypic values from individuals and a phylogenetic tree as input, and then samples species means and variances, along with the parameters of the evolutionary model, from their joint posterior probability distribution. One of the most novel and intriguing attributes of this approach is that jointly sampling the species means with the evolutionary model parameters means that the model and tree can influence our estimates of species mean trait values, not just the reverse. In the present implementation, we first apply this method to the most widely used evolutionary model for continuously valued phenotypic trait data (Brownian motion). However, the general approach has broad applicability, which we illustrate by also fitting the λ model, another simple model for quantitative trait evolution on a phylogeny. We test our approach via simulation and by analyzing two empirical datasets obtained from the literature. Finally, we have implemented the methods described herein in a new function for the R statistical computing environment, and this function will be distributed as part of the 'phytools' R library. © 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
AB - Phylogenetic comparative methods that incorporate intraspecific variability are relatively new and, so far, not especially widely used in empirical studies. In the present short article we will describe a new Bayesian method for fitting evolutionary models to comparative data that incorporates intraspecific variability. This method differs from an existing likelihood-based approach in that it requires no a priori inference about species means and variances; rather it takes phenotypic values from individuals and a phylogenetic tree as input, and then samples species means and variances, along with the parameters of the evolutionary model, from their joint posterior probability distribution. One of the most novel and intriguing attributes of this approach is that jointly sampling the species means with the evolutionary model parameters means that the model and tree can influence our estimates of species mean trait values, not just the reverse. In the present implementation, we first apply this method to the most widely used evolutionary model for continuously valued phenotypic trait data (Brownian motion). However, the general approach has broad applicability, which we illustrate by also fitting the λ model, another simple model for quantitative trait evolution on a phylogeny. We test our approach via simulation and by analyzing two empirical datasets obtained from the literature. Finally, we have implemented the methods described herein in a new function for the R statistical computing environment, and this function will be distributed as part of the 'phytools' R library. © 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
U2 - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01645.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01645.x
M3 - Research Article
SN - 0014-3820
VL - 66
SP - 2697
EP - 2707
JO - Evolution
JF - Evolution
IS - 9
ER -