TY - JOUR
T1 - A behavioral investigation of supply chain contracts for a newsvendor problem in a developing economy
AU - Castañeda, Jaime Andrés
AU - Brennan, Mark
AU - Goentzel, Jarrod
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to thank the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) Special Operations (Logistics Capacity Development) and the WFP Uganda Country Office, and the Makerere University's College of Business and Management Sciences for enabling us to work with the six silo manufacturers and the forty Makerere students, respectively. The data and analysis from which our motivation and background sections draw heavily was done by the authors as well as Emily Gooding, Jennifer Green and Jonars Spielberg through the Comprehensive Initiative on Technology Evaluation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The fieldwork was made possible through the support of the United States Agency for International Development ( USAID ), grant no. AID-OAA-A-12-00095 , and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF), Switzerland, grant no. P2TIP1_148341 . We also thank Nelson Gómez-Cruz and Sebastián Villa for their critical and constructive views on this paper. We gratefully acknowledge the constructive comments from the review team. All remaining errors are our own.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - The business context in developing economies introduces challenges in scaling production that are often distinct from those faced in mature economies. This study focuses on the potential for risk-sharing mechanisms to overcome some of those challenges for agricultural supply chains in Uganda. The study follows a two-stage research approach conducted in collaboration with the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), which supported adoption of hermetic crop storage products such as silos in the country since 2013. In the first stage, through interviews with six artisanal silo manufacturers we identified three constraints in scaling silo production that were accentuated by the newsvendor dynamics in this market. In the second stage, we considered the potential for risk-sharing contracts to help alleviate some of those constraints and explored behavioral explanations to account for differences. We ran a laboratory experiment using two contracts that our interviews suggest are feasible in this business context: a buyback mechanism that allows manufacturers to share the risks of procuring excess metal sheets and a salvage mechanism that allows them to share the risks of over-producing silos. The results reveal a consistent under-ordering across both contracts. They also show that while buyback participants respond to contract prices as existing theory would predict, salvage participants do not. Our study provides insights regarding the potential, and the limitations, of different risk-sharing mechanisms to increase the supply of products in developing economies.
AB - The business context in developing economies introduces challenges in scaling production that are often distinct from those faced in mature economies. This study focuses on the potential for risk-sharing mechanisms to overcome some of those challenges for agricultural supply chains in Uganda. The study follows a two-stage research approach conducted in collaboration with the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), which supported adoption of hermetic crop storage products such as silos in the country since 2013. In the first stage, through interviews with six artisanal silo manufacturers we identified three constraints in scaling silo production that were accentuated by the newsvendor dynamics in this market. In the second stage, we considered the potential for risk-sharing contracts to help alleviate some of those constraints and explored behavioral explanations to account for differences. We ran a laboratory experiment using two contracts that our interviews suggest are feasible in this business context: a buyback mechanism that allows manufacturers to share the risks of procuring excess metal sheets and a salvage mechanism that allows them to share the risks of over-producing silos. The results reveal a consistent under-ordering across both contracts. They also show that while buyback participants respond to contract prices as existing theory would predict, salvage participants do not. Our study provides insights regarding the potential, and the limitations, of different risk-sharing mechanisms to increase the supply of products in developing economies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060921433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060921433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.024
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.024
M3 - Research Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060921433
SN - 0925-5273
VL - 210
SP - 72
EP - 83
JO - International Journal of Production Economics
JF - International Journal of Production Economics
ER -