TY - JOUR
T1 - 20 Years of Securitization: Strengths, Limitations and A New Dual Framework, Uluslararasi Iliskiler
AU - Baysal, Basar
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Copenhagen School scholars introduced Securitization Theory in 1998 in a comprehensive way. Since then, it has been used widely to examine diverse topics. The strength of the theory derives from its constructivist ontology and clear framework. However, the theory has various limitations including lack of the analysis of rival views. This study aims to outline the strengths and limitations of Securitization Theory and present a novel framework for securitization. The new framework provides a dual approach for examining non-violent oppositions and counter-securitizations. It also analyses the securitization process in three phases: decision/ definition, construction, and insecuritization-in-action.
AB - Copenhagen School scholars introduced Securitization Theory in 1998 in a comprehensive way. Since then, it has been used widely to examine diverse topics. The strength of the theory derives from its constructivist ontology and clear framework. However, the theory has various limitations including lack of the analysis of rival views. This study aims to outline the strengths and limitations of Securitization Theory and present a novel framework for securitization. The new framework provides a dual approach for examining non-violent oppositions and counter-securitizations. It also analyses the securitization process in three phases: decision/ definition, construction, and insecuritization-in-action.
U2 - https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.777338
DO - https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.777338
M3 - Artículo
SN - 1304-7310
VL - 17
SP - 3
EP - 20
JO - Uluslararasi Iliskiler
JF - Uluslararasi Iliskiler
IS - 67
ER -
